RE: TotalBiscuit - My thoughts on Quake Champions

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

TotalBiscuit - My thoughts on Quake Champions

in gaming •  8 years ago  (edited)

By your logic, you are not providing sufficient effort to make money from your lets play videos. I dont agree with this stance because its stupid but BY YOUR LOGIC the above is true.

Also I made multiple arguments all refuting your points.

  1. Facebook, twitter and reddit make money off of posting content. I do not agree that its different at all on who the is the one making the profits. People who aggregate should be allowed to make money too.

  2. Even if you don't directly profit from sharing content you can still benefit greatly from building a following. Sharing content either by resteem or sharing on youtube does contribute to a larger following.

  3. Aggregation is an extremely important aspect of the internet. Sharing content is 100% fine provided you site the original author.

  4. Two paragraphs for 30 minutes of content is a subjective and arbitrary amount. Meaning that some people may think 2 paragraphs as being sufficient while others will not. By this line of reasoning you either need to accept that this is a gray area or that your input is not subjective based on some kind of criteria. Be careful because your lets play videos are subjected to those same rules!

So anyway, you also just lied when you said I didn't state any arguments. For a moralist you seem to be ok with that kind of behavior.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I didn't lie about you not stating your arguments. I just didn't see them in your posts.

  1. I think it is hugely important who makes the money. If it's the person sharing the content that changes the dynamic in my opinion.
  2. That is certainly true - but the change (for me) comes when money comes into question.
  3. Yes - unless you get money from sharing it
  4. Yes. I agree here, the amount of content needed is highly subjective. I'm just saying ! I ! think two small paragraphs aren't enough for a 30 minutes of commentary.
    There certainly is a grey area here. I am willing to accept that.