I stumbled upon the trailer for a documentary about genetically modified food titled, Scientists Under Attack. When I decided to buy the DVD, I discovered that it was not available in the United States. I had been doing research about Monsanto and learning about the science behind GMO's, and what I learned was that a lot of information on the topic was being suppressed. Each question that arose in my mind led to another question and before long, I was reading many books and studying the work of Vandana Shiva, Jeffery Smith and Bertram Verhaag.
I wrote to Bertram Verhaag, a German film director of 9 films about GMO's, in the hopes that I could interview him about his work. He not only granted me an interview, he sent me his DVD, a hand-written letter, all for free. His films are not sensational doom porn. They are documentaries. There are a lot of interviews with scientists, farmers and officials who are directly related to policy surrounding GMO's. Scientists Under Attack illustrates perfectly what happens when 95% of scientists whom are researching genetically modified organisms are being funded by corporations. The remaining 5% of independent scientists who decided to do GMO research on their own are extremely vulnerable and the film shows this vulnerability very well. This film was one of the first to really wake me up.
Here's the trailer for Scientists Under Attack: Genetic Engineering in The Magnetic Field of Money
Here's the link to the film preview auf Deutsch: http://www.onlinefilm.org/en_EN/film/52070
The most shocking thing I learned during these interviews is that Monsanto tried to remove his film from German television.
He said that Monsanto officials came to a German TV station unannounced and told the station to quit airing Verhaag's documentary. Monsanto took him to court in an attempt to silence him, but the courts ended up dismissing the case after it was concluded that Verhaag's film was indeed factual.
Here are the 4 parts of my Skype interview with German filmmaker, Bertram Verhaag:
Scientists Under Attack has won the following awards:
(2010) THE INDIE FEST 2010: BEST DOCUMENTARY, La Jolla
(2010) TOP TEN FILMS AT KANSAS INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL, Kansas
(2010) AT&T AWARD FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION AND STEWARDSHIP, Los Angeles
(2010) THE COLUMBUS INSTITUTE FOR CONTEMPORARY JOURNALISM AWARD, Columbus
(2010) ACCOLADE AWARD: BEST DOCUMENTARY
(2010) BEST FEATURE DOCUMENTARY AT MAVERICK MOVIE AWARDS, Meriden
(2010) BEST ORIGINAL SCORE AT MAVERICK MOVIE AWARDS, Meriden
(2011) SALUS JOURNALIST AWARD, Munich
There's a lot of controversy surrounding GMO's but until you've really reasearched it, and I mean done some serious digging, you won't really understand it very well. Dr. Vandana Shiva is a great resource as well because she was a physicist at the time when she learned about Monsanto's goal of patenting all the seeds on earth. That was the moment when she began her work in protecting organic biodiversity and founded her institute. When Bertram Verhaag learned about Monsanto's development of a Terminator Seed, that's when he began to become interested in creating films about GMO's.
Thanks for your attention,
Stellabelle
Great job bringing more reality to awareness. There are many deniers of reality, who purport themselves under the veil of "scientism" where they just deny potential harm, and existing evidence, because it's not from a "professionally" funded scientist, or hasn't been verified by those funded scientists, etc.
Tobacco, waste, and many other things, all they have to do is "Deny" until "proof" comes out, even though the obvious reality is apparent to many. Fracking has had the same BS of denial around the problems they cause. Some people have become gullible fools who can't discern what is going on around them with their own senses, they need a centralized authority to validate "Reality"... lol
Tampering with genetics is a deluded game from confused people who don't understand what they are doing. It's just "science" to them. Understanding the abuse of power to alter life around us according to our self-deluded desires for "cleaner" food that doesn't get little insects bugging it. If they get the result they want, then who cares about understanding the real long term consequences to actions... short term gains and $$$.
The world is stuck on centralized living, so monoculture is the "only" way to live in the future... People think cities are "good", but cities are dead. There is nothing there but concentrations of human populations with no sustainability and complete dependence on outside factors to sustain these concrete jungles of crap.
Here is the video as well for download:
Resteemed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
cool, thanks for the downloadable video. Have you watched this film? It's quite impressive and this kind of suppression of knowledge is most likely going on in a lot of fields. I agree with you about the unsustainable aspect of city living. It's another reason why I decided to move to the country. Thanks for the resteem.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
m8 we have been doing cross pollination forever. Also we have vertical farms that do well, we just need funding to build more.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There is one single fact that matters...the data for the effects of a single GM food released into the wild over the long term DOES NOT EXIST. Let alone the data for the potentially compounding effects of multiple GM food releases. Releasing transgenic material into the wild is yet another example of extreme hubris. What's more these greedy psychopaths take the choices of others away forever. Whatever problems humanity faces, let's not pretend that the solutions that corporations present to us are the best....they are the ones that can be best exploited for profit or power in the shortest time possible.
We know transgenic material has been released into the wild without proper testing.
We know it turns up thousands of miles from release sites.
We know that more pesticides gets sprayed on our food.
We know that 'pest' species have become resistant to pesticides.
We know biotech companies have developed seed terminator technologies.
We know that biotech companies want to own the global seed supply.
Isn't that enough to know that these mentalists know nothing but greed, don't care about consequences and are totally out of control?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
One only has to look at what has been happening to the Indian farmers to truly understand this thing. I agree completely with what you said. Greed knows no end. And the brainwashing is complete, many people cannot see the truth, even when they are given it. Anyone wanting to learn more, should start reading the work of the physicist, Vandana Shiva.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
What is happening to those poor Indian farmers is monstrous, absolutely monstrous. I believe Bayer has recently bought Monsanto...no doubt in an effort to avoid litigation and give their toxic product a fresh veneer.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
really? I hadn't heard that news. I'm mostly avoiding news these days. The Indian farmers are really bad off. I couldn't believe it when I discovered what was going on there. Shame!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The first thing the defenders of establishment "science" say is "where is your peer reviewed, clinical trials?". If it is Industry that is in bed with the establishment they somehow get a pass. They don't even do the studies, or if they do and get results other than the ones they want, the data is suppressed.
We inevitably get the uninformed, who say, "it's just the same as cross pollinated hybridization", which it, clearly, is not. I think that the uninformed should be allowed to eat whatever poison they believe is so safe, if they would take away the choice of others to say no.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
agree! Yeah
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great work @stellabelle. I posted your article in Facebook. Thank you for sharing this. And thank you @krnel for the movie itself. I'm glad, to have you both on my Steemit–radar.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Think what you want but that statement is extremely hyperbolic, and is an equal contributor to a lack of discourse on topics like this among people. Its hard to get a scientist on board when you go around calling everyone a corporate shill.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This relates to the biotech study scientists. It came directly from the documentary. I should change the wording to reflect that. Don't accuse me, look at the facts that are coming straight from the documentary. If you haven't seen the film, then you're lacking in information.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am one of that 95% so the statements apply to me, I make up my own mind on every issue based upon what the data indicates. If the data indicates something I support that and defend it, if the data changes through new research, then I re-evaluate and update my statements to reflect it.
While I don't directly study GMO's (and I have no interest in doing so) what I work on is used by people who are in that field. I am critical when the data indicates I should be, and not when it doesn't. Funding doesn't have anything to do with it.
If the statements you have made come from that documentary, then I think you should put "facts" like this.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have not asserted that every scientist is somehow corrupted by their funding sources. However, this documentary shows one particular field that has been very much affected by money and power. It's a documentary, so if you haven't seen it, we could discuss the facts contained within it. However, what you describe is your personal experience with one field, which is obviously your real experiences. I'm not doubting that real science takes place that is corporate funded. We are discussing two different things: your personal experience, and the documentary that explores the lives of many independent scientists.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well I thank you for at least your edit in clarification of the statement in the post text above. People read things like how it was initially written, generalize and it slowly paints scientists into a corner. 99.5% of scientists are good people who are just interested in understanding how the world works and trying to do things to make peoples lives easier if possible.
That said I do genetically modify organisms in my work, only for the purpose of producing things for me. ;)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
As usual, a fraction are bad people is sufficient to categorize an entire field :(
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This is a complex issue.
People have been genetically modifying things since the dawn of time. There is a lot of hysteria surrounding this subject much of which is ill informed.
That said we need to be very careful when we are dealing with genetic changes which would not be possible to arise in nature.
There are numerous examples of biological mistakes made by well meaning people and just through ignorance. What we need is balanced discussion and consideration of the pros and cons of the subjects.
For example GM plants may offer a safer alternative to the use of pesticides - yet we rarely hear this kind of perspective.
I don't for a second trust large companies like Monsanto but just like companies are not universally good I think it is incorrect to assume they are universally bad. Ultimately they sell us products which we want because they fulfil a need - i.e. cheap food.
To be honest I see both sides of this issue. The stakes are high in terms of doing nothing i.e. crops being lost and people going without in developing countries, or greater use of pesticides with all of their associated risks.
On the other hand genetic manipulation also carries high potential risks which once out in the wild could not easily be reversed if at all.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I disagree. This is NOT a complex issue.
It is a deadly game of keep information from the public.
No they haven't!
This is the number one excuse used. What humans have been doing "since the dawn of time" is to cross pollinate plants. In fact, bees have been doing this long before man. It is the reason why plants produce a male part and a female part. If the biodiversity wasn't important, then the plants would just pollinate themselves internally, or some such.
Genetically modifying is some scientists taking a soybean DNA and splicing in some grasshopper DNA.
We haven't had gene sequencers but for the last few decades. That is not "since the dawn of time" by a long shot.
When Monsanto does operations to remove tumors from their mice subjects, that is manipulating test data in the extreme. That they did this is not up for debate. The group in Europe who performed the same tests as Mansanto, but instead of the 3 months, they extended it out, found HUGE increase in cancer.
And, about the pesticides, Monsanto is engineering plants that NEED Monsanto pesticides.
There are people, every day, in India, committing suicide by drinking Monsanto pesticides.
Now, for the "other side" that you say that you see.
Permaculture farmers are growing far more with far less. They are actually repairing the soil. They are seeing increased yields. In fact, from Monsanto/mono-crop farmer, "Unbelievable yields".
Monsanto is not about trying to increase crop yields or actually make things better for insects or people. They are trying to kill people and destroy nations by controlling all the seeds.
There is no upside to what Monsanto is doing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I disagree with that. We are not going to agree on this issue.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Exactly. I spent several years researching these topics, including the science behind genetic engineering in an attempt to understand the truth. Anyone who is just casually learning stuff about GMO's will not have the depth of knowledge that those of us who spent years have. The sooner Monsanto is wiped off the earth, the better off humanity and its creatures will be. Bovine growth hormone that Monsanto used to manufacture was found to be harmful both to the cows and humans. It is not used anymore. The same needs to occur with Round-up, and seed patenting.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I wouldn't bother debating thecryptofiend, he doesn't seem to do much in the way of critical thinking.
If the establishment says it's so, then it must be, GMOs, vaccines, etc.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Who was it you were accusing of being ill informed?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
From your tone it looks like you are after a fight. Try elsewhere.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you are trying to call informed people ignorant, perhaps it is you who should try elsewhere.
No fights here, unless ignorant people start getting uppity.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
many are modified for drought resistance and stuff like that. Increased pesticide resistance is only one branch. Also the main problem is them trying to use capitalism to control our seed supply to make money off it.
Also the GMOs don't cause the problem, it's the pesticides we use.
We have a food problem, that climate change is going to increase significantly, we need to use GMOs to produce enough food.
Also, if we know what a specific gene does, putting it in another type of plant really doesn't change much. Its just a quicker cross pollination, which we have been doing forever.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The world is stuck on centralized living
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
bra jobb thanks
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Very well said!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Good work @stellabelle. Way to go on the going above and beyond to try to keep people informed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for this, I need to watch and save it.
I knew the Monsan-toe-rags were evil, but this evil? Wow.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
yeah, I had no idea before this film what the hell was going on.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I haven't been following you @stellabelle, but I can see from this example of your work I've been missing out on quality material. I was actually surprised to learn who you "worked for" from meeting you at the Ozarks Steemit meetup. I mistakenly assumed you being a writer was more on the literary / artistic end of the spectrum, which may be true, however your skills as a researcher and tech topics are also excellent. Adding you to my feed.
Great work!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit