RE: Perception changes Everything - Is Taxation really theft?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Perception changes Everything - Is Taxation really theft?

in government •  8 years ago  (edited)

But there is! There are tons of places that the "smart contract" of the goverment doesn't apply.

Liberland, most of Australia, most of Mongolia, many places in Latin America and Russia, There are tons of places where the goverment doesn't really give a fuck if you go there.

Nothing is "morally wrong". Morality is subjective because morality is defined by the group, not some higher entity. morality is a construct of the group, the masses. They decide what is moral and what is not. It is something people agree upon. This is why every single part of the earth has different morality. this is why every single person has a different morality.

Saying "the goverment" is a massively erroneous generalisation since there are many goverments and many places without a goverment.

There is nothing "inherently evil". Some people agreed that things should be "X" and you were born in that place. That contract is written on those parametres. if you don't like it then you can live. really. you can. nobody is holding you slave or abuses you. that's just sensationalisms.

// If slavery is taking 100% of my income, at what percentages is it no longer slavery?//

You don't need to repeat to me libertarian memes. You are not making any more points by doing it. Again. it is slavery if you HAVE to pay it and they won't let you go. If you can leave then it is not slavery. You are paying a "fee" for being there.

No I don't see goverment as evil because the goverment is a generic concept much like religion. Science is not evil. Religion is not evil. Schooling is not evil, parenting is not evil. these are just concepts. they can be evil or good depending on who is judging them and from what specific scope.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
Loading...

tons of places

In support of this claim you list Liberland (which I recognize as having the potential of being possibly one of the only places, along with the Sea Steading Institute, but it's still just a possibility), Mongolia (not a place many humans want to live), most of Australia (also basically uninhabitable, unless you happen to be an Aborigine and care little about modern quality of life), Russia (might as well also list the North and South poles), and Latin America. Latin America comes close to a rational argument for me, and I have been looking into options like Belize, Chile, Panama, Costa Rica, and the like. Unfortunately, there's still government backed by violence or there's more obvious Mafia-stye enforcement (bribe this group or that group, etc) which I may actually prefer because at least there's no pretense. One could at least argue there's slightly less monopoly use of force going on. I'm looking into it from a "lesser of many evils" perspective.

Morality is subjective because morality is defined by the group

I've discussed morality before and don't think it's as subjective as you see it. Many disagree with me, but I think it's based on where humanity as a whole sits on Maslow's Hierarchy of needs. If morality was subjective, we could create arguments to justify things like rape, murder, and theft. Given the modern realities of our species and where we are on the evolutionary scale of consciousness, I don't think those arguments could be valid. Some things (at this stage in history) are clearly wrong and can not be justified (IMO).

That contract is written on those parametres.

I wish we could use more accurate language because there is no actual contract. No consenting adult agreed to "it" simply by location of birth and where they grew up. I can't think of any valid, enforceable contract that doesn't involve conscious choice by consenting adults. Even the "by signing up, you agree to our terms of service" have some problems in court (and I don't mean "court" in just the legal sense). To me, "the social contract" is a story we tell ourselves to feel better about our current immoral situation.

it is slavery if you HAVE to pay it and they won't let you go.

Try not paying. Try leaving without paying. Try leaving without paying an exit fee. Try arriving somewhere other than Siberia and also not paying. From my perspective, you're telling yourself a story (as we all are), but your story doesn't seem consistent with reality from my perspective. If I'm paying a fee and that fee is not voluntary and if I don't pay the fee, violent force is used against me, that's called extortion. We can call it other things, if we like, but that's what the word means.

I see government as evil because I define it as a monopoly on the initiation of force within a geographic region (rights I believe no one has, so no one can delegate them). If we had social structures which didn't have that specific characteristic and met the needs we have in society, I'd be all about it, and I wouldn't describe it as "government" as I do the State. It would be similar to so many other voluntary organizations we have that do have real contracts like home owner's associations, bowling leagues, boy scouts, etc, etc.

And yes, this is certainly true:

they can be evil or good depending on who is judging them and from what specific scope

We have the arguments we can make and support with evidence. I appreciate being able to voice my views and hear criticisms of them.

Loading...

You have to buy your freedom from the U.S.A. You can't just leave and be free of them. They still claim ownership of you.

@kyriacos - Regarding your idea that it is easy to leave the country and rid oneself of the leech that is the US government:

According to the IRS: "Your worldwide income is subject to U.S. income tax, regardless of where you reside."
https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/u-s-citizens-and-resident-aliens-abroad

According to the US government, you must request permission to renounce citizenship and it can be denied:

"A person wishing to renounce his or her U.S. citizenship must voluntarily and with intent to relinquish U.S. citizenship:

  1. appear in person before a U.S. consular or diplomatic officer,
  2. in a foreign country at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate; and
  3. sign an oath of renunciation
    https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal-considerations/us-citizenship-laws-policies/renunciation-of-citizenship.html

You also have to pay extortion money in order to "legally" separate yourself. This article explains quite a bit: http://www.mondaq.com/canada/x/227982/Income+Tax/Renouncing+Your+US+Citizenship+Is+Divorcing+Uncle+Sam+Right+For+You

Lastly, without paying for a passport (paying for the right to move my physical body to another physical location), it is not easy to leave or enter another country. In fact, I know people who were recently denied entry into Canada for a visit due to petty, old "criminal" charges for which fines and probation were paid and served years prior to attempting to cross the imaginary line between the US and Canada. Again, this was just for a visit, not even a request for citizenship, which is a whole other process.

Bullshit. one good friend of mine just moved to Kuwait and dropped his green card.

Where do you people hear these things? Research the laws of your own country guys. stop listening to bullshiters.