Is it possible that the power vacuum argument is created by actions of the state? For example, the state destabilizing Iraq and Syria allowed them to create and fund an inorganic ISIS movement, which people use as an example of a stateless society. However, without government destabilizing a nation and propping up a warring faction, this example wouldn't exist, right?
RE: The "Power Vacuum" Argument
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The "Power Vacuum" Argument
well, that definately is a part of it. Never-mind that Iraq is a State t hat has or at lest had) a government (never mind (even if it is a very crappy one using the Statist standards) . Furthermore, also Isis wrose to one Government seeking to overthrow another and replace it with anothe government friendly to them. (boy did tha backfire).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Right, but from the position the world is now, we are all seeking to convert from a governed state to a voluntaryist state, so your first premise of Iraq being a state is a moot point, right?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Individual power vacuums are often by design, but none of them happen at all if the people don't believe in ruling classes.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit