Nice article @nolnocluap! :)
It's interesting how much the privacy issue has raised around the world after the introduction of digital technologies. I am thinking about a world that will be pervaded by AI assistants in every work environment.
Let's say that AI could become a good consultant thanks to its algorithms, how politicians want to regulate the way these computers have to select what to record from what is illegal to record in order to maintain some sort of workers/clients privacy?
RE: Privacy, The Law & Ethics: When State Dictate Conflicts With Moral Judgement
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Privacy, The Law & Ethics: When State Dictate Conflicts With Moral Judgement
You raise a good point @thetranshumanist. Algos have no capacity for moral judgement and no ability to decide to go against the law for the greater good. If anything, they will be implemented to be almost entirely law based, and would be reviewed for compliance.
I'd not thought of that aspect of the discussion. Thanks for bringing it to the discussion. It makes me even more concerned for the future to think that the human element is likely to be removed from human engagement in the context of important issues such as these.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I like your response to this article
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you @apiprincz! If you are interested in this kind of discussions, follow me and stay tuned :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit