This rant was unappropriate. I do not know about dutch's intentions so I can and will not comment on that part. What I know is that putting the blame on dutch completely is wrong!

The communication in the cryptocurrencytalk forums on this topic were a mess.
It was Peppernrino who posted the misleading link to the ODLK's testing branch website, not dutch.
This was cleared up a bit by ICE00 who hosts the testing branch website. But they also made the statement to add two entries to the whitelist if the vote turns out on a Yes. This put up an unnecessary discussion later and again put the wrong project website into focus.
You made it clear what was the reason for the two different websites but on January 16th Neuralminer stated that the vote was concerning the testing branch webstite ODLK1. ICE00 reacted to this without any opposing comment.
The perfect comment on the situation came from Nataly Makarova: "Now the initiators of the vote have problems."
When the vote got through someone made a whitelist entry with the name Odlk1 but the team stats url for ODLK.

Now, please enlighten me. In which parts of this huge mess of miscommunication do I need to add lines for dutch having something to do with it?