Could you explain a little bit more what is wrong with having 10,000 GRC in 10,000 different UTXOs of 1 GRC each?
RE: UTXO Size vs Efficiency for upcoming Constant Block Rewards
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
UTXO Size vs Efficiency for upcoming Constant Block Rewards
A) It is wholly unnecessary. The smallest UTXO you will ever need is 800, and that is with a difficulty of 1.
B) Sending 10,000 GRC to 10,000 UTXO addresses will take you ages, congest the network, and cost you a small fortune in transaction fees.
C) Your wallet has to iterate over every UTXO every 8 seconds when staking. Depending on your hardware (such as if you were running a raspberry pi or other low power device) you may not be able to "check" all your UTXOs in time for each block, causing you to miss stakes.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@barton26 is absolutely right!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
How would we know if we were being affected by the problem described in C?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Unless you've done something silly like manually create thousands of UTXOs, that would never realistically occur. Through testing on my RPI3 I know that <500 UTXOs you see no issues at all.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Will anyone explain whether the chances to stake are exactly the same with 10K grx in 10K UTXO rather than having 1 single 10K UTXO?
Somehow, it looks like probability is not a "linear" addition of each UTXO...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit