I support the idea of users having an option to have their pool projects auto selected by admin. But it MUST stay as an option and respect user preferences in what projects to run. Eg, the option will only pause-unpause the projects, but not detach or attach a new one.
RE: Gridcoin Missed Opportunities
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Gridcoin Missed Opportunities
Even if pool users check this "auto-select" option, they are still going to complain when their GRC income suddenly drops to zero when they get automatically switched from PPS Sieve to GFN subproject.
This GTX1080 user is a good example - he is getting around 6.5 credits/sec crunching PPS Sieve, but only around 2.1 credits per sec running GFN20. For shorter workunits, like GFN-15 of GFN-16 (which are most likely to quickly reveal a new prime), he would get much less than that, basically all his mag would disappear. Other prime-discovering subprojects are all CPU, meaning they earn even less GRC, since GPU crunchers collect most of the credits.
The PrimeGrid's idea is that users who get a chance to discover a new prime don't need large credits, because they are always honored as prime discoverers, listed on PrimeGrid's webpage and on The Prime Pages. This credit restriction severely limits their GRC income in turn.
We could turn the tide by:
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit