This is just a bunch of factual errors, disinformation and plain dumbness.
It advocates total passivity and doing nothing, since everything approved by the polls is carried out by some members of the community. For example, the New Marketing Initiative approved last year is currently carried out by me - this is not called 'centralization', but volunteering. The dev work is done by our fixed team of devs, shall we sack them all because they are 'centralizing' the development of Gridcoin too much?
Signing up on Steemit is free, but the process takes 1-2 weeks. Only instant access requires a small fee. On the other hand, so called "Reddit Premium" costs $6 per month -> no such nonsense on Steemit!
First off, this doesn't address the main point Nethlek was trying to make: That Steemit is not instant access. If someone wants to comment on the poll you're telling them to wait 1-2 weeks to post a comment?! On reddit creating an account is free and takes a few seconds.
What does reddit premium have to do with anything? It's absolutely not required to post, and just removes ads from the site. Which is funny, because Steemit has ads now, and there is nothing you can do to remove those...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
This poll was discussed on Slack for like two months, on various channels (official-social-media, marketing, poll-drafts etc). I was present in every channel and no one has raised any serious objections, except those made up fears about "Steemit monetization" but that was already decided on a different poll and has nothing to do with this one. Steemit content has already been approved for our Twitter.
Of course, you know all this very well, since you are a Gridcoin dev and veteran and have participated in those polls and discussions on Slack yourself. But, it seems that you have conveniently forgotten that and now you are acting 'surprised'... because no one is able to comment the poll? Ridiculous.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If it takes 1-2 weeks, it has some merits. Instant sign up might be important for making ad-hoc anonymous accounts to spam etc. (possible to create alt account on steem too, but not on a whim or paid). Second important thing is that valuable voice we can expect from members that have some knowledge about ecosystem, so instant sing up is not important.
The root problem here is almost no governance rules for the project and little will to create such rules or to set them up in motion.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Community guidelines and code of practice/conduct are easily introducable to the Gridcoin-Community github organisation and to how we evaluate poll outcomes. Governance rules elsewhere contradict the decentralized nature of crypto, imo.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There's nothing stopping anyone from taking this discussion elsewhere. Create a few threads on alternative platforms then link them in these comments, problem completely solved.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You can run an ad blocker to be fair
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You could say the same thing about reddit. The entire "reddit premium" argument is moot.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm not arguing that case 🤷♂️
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Coming from an account literally masquerading as an official gridcoin account? Hypocrisy
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit