If Everybody had a gun virtually nobody would use them.

in guns •  8 years ago  (edited)

Imagine you are in a room with 90 people and one gun. Your gun. You don't plan on murdering anyone but for some reason you decided to be an idiot that day an accidentally fired it. The round scares people but luckily misses your foot and hits the ground causing minimal injuries from shrapnel. You live they live everyone goes home.Well you might be going to jail but that's not important right now.

Imagine now you are in a room with 90 guns and 90 people. Your gun and 89 other people carrying a single gun. You don't plan on murdering anyone but for some reason you decided to be an idiot and accidentally fire the gun. Immediately a trigger happy person in the room shoots you in the face because they thought you were firing in their direction. It might not happen. You might still live to be a huge idiot. But the worry is there. You are more cautions about accidentally or purposefully firing a weapon around other guns. Unless you are a suicidal terrorist with no regard for your own life. More guns equals less violence.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  
  ·  8 years ago (edited)

Criminals will always have guns. ALWAYS. This is the single biggest factor that people who call for gun control fail to understand. A gun, in essence, is nothing more than a tool. It's no different than a drill, a hammer, a weed-whacker or a cheese grater. All tools can be used for actions outside their designs. A gun is a tool for hunting and protection. Violent people, even in the complete absence of guns, will always find a tool to use.

I think the main reason people call for gun control is to set their mind at ease. They don't care if criminals will always have guns, they only care that there is a law on the books to ban them. This is due to complete indoctrination and a desire for the state to babysit their fragile and childish mindset.

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

Right! It's a lot like the "Paradox of Defensive Driving." In a nutshell, defensive driving means driving while assuming that the rest of the folks on the road are either not-so-good drivers or are somewhat reckless. In other words, driving while vigilant to the possibility of an accident occurring.

If virtually everyone on the road takes this to heart, there'll be hardly any accidents. (and hardly any need to drive defensively!) The only ones that'll result will come from mishaps that are unquestionably out of the drivers' control.

well that's one way to look at it i guess. i mean im all for guns but.. that may not be the best argument for them iv ever heard.. just saying :p

If we are talking implausible scenarios.... How about if no one had a gun no one would use them?

"A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." -- George Washington

Exactly. Which is why gang members never shoot each other.

I think at some point we are going to need to learn to control our savage impulses. Ninety people sitting in a pool of gasoline have the same sort of problem but draining away the gasoline would lower everyones emotions and help them get along. Handing out matches to everyone is the wrong approach imho. More guns aren't going to solve the real issues which stem for a basic fear and distrust.