Yep. I mean, I saw @theycallmedan call for people to tell him about good creators. But good is so subjective that none of us may fit into the preferences of a few whales. Linear worked because you found that account you clicked with, you bought your stake, and you started rewarding them even if no one else did. You could build a following that way. Now, if you don't HAVE a following, how would you build a following? No one should vote on a post that won't get to 20 (0r 40) steem, and no user that doesn't already regularly get 20-40 steem is going suddenly start regularly getting 20-40 steem per post. We can make all the promises we want about new steem behavior, but no whale has enough time to find all the undiscovered talent.
RE: HF21 (and 22) are done, how do you feel?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
HF21 (and 22) are done, how do you feel?
Yes, I totally agree with you. @theycallmedan is the exception.. But the reality is quite another.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Exactly, which is why this whole thing is going to do more harm than good and ultimately end up hurting steem.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit