I figured that the Ivy League had become so intersectional that she would be invincible.
Still, let's be real, she was ousted because of her plagiarism. If her blatant hatred toward Jews were the only problem, she would just be normal in the Ivy League.
That said, to jump off of my ethical question from yesterday, all of these presidents who testified before congress suffer from the problem that they're not morons. If they were, I could give them the benefit of the doubt in regard to their testimonies.
The problem is that they all know what they would say if the question were regarding calls for the genocide of black people, or Hispanic people, or calls for violence against LGBT people.
They know that they were playing hide the ball with evil ideas. These aren't people who hold pernicious beliefs and think that those beliefs are just. These are people who know that they're wrong, and think that they can outsmart us.
To be fair, apparently they did outsmart the people who work on SNL; but, that's not saying much.