illegal To Cure | Why Cancer and Other Diseases Aren't Allowed To Be CuredsteemCreated with Sketch.

in health •  7 years ago 


A cure for all disease...wouldn't that be great? While millions of dollars are donated to non-profit organizations, supposedly searching for a cure, there are wellness centers and doctors all around the world who are successfully curing diseases that are considered incurable here. Yes, that's right. There are already many natural cures for virtually every disease, and every day we learn more. Why haven't you heard about these cures, you ask? Because it's illegal in this country for anyone to tell you they can cure you of something unless their treatment is FDA approved, even if it does! (html comment removed: more)

In Search of a Cure For Cancer


The cancer industry alone brought in $100 billion in revenue last year, and that number is expected to continue climbing each year. That much money is already unfathomable, but just imagine how much is spent on all diseases combined. The U.S. spends far more on healthcare than any other country in the world, often paying twice as much or more for the same drugs. However, we're far from the healthiest. In fact, we're the only country on the top 10 list of the highest healthcare spending that has a life expectancy under 80 years. That means that even though we spend far more than any other country on healthcare, we're far from the healthiest.

The pharmaceutical industry is one of the most profitable industries in the world. They're not the only ones that profit from the medical system though. So many people make a living off of the treatment of chronic disease -doctors, nurses, caregivers, pharmacists, etc. Even the government has their hands in that pot. According to the Center For Responsive Politics, drug companies and their lobbying groups spent $229 million to influence politics in 2014. The American Cancer Society raised $934 million in donations in 2012. Its CEO makes almost a million dollars per year and still hasn't found a cure! I bet if his annual salary were to accumulate in an escrow account that he couldn't touch until they found a cure he'd find a cure quick! You see, there's a huge financial incentive for him to continue "searching for a cure." The billions of dollars being made every year from cancer treatment could all be taken away by one thing - a cure.

We're told there isn't a cure for most of the common diseases, such as cancer. Yet countless people have found ways to cure themselves of cancer. There have been many people who have successfully got rid of their cancer using alternative methods, often times ridding their bodies of terminal cancer after the mainstream medical system gave up on them. If just one person can do it, others can too. The interesting thing about it is many of these people used safe, cheap, natural methods to do so. Why is that illegal? Because it's not profitable and the pharmaceutical industry has made it so that no one is allowed to use natural treatments to prevent or cure disease.

The FDA Creates a Monopoly For The Pharmaceutical Industry

The FDA and the drug companies are in bed together and they squeeze out competitions and build up their monopolies and they love government medicine because they make more money." -Ron Paul (two time presidential candidate)
Under guise of protecting the people by regulating the food and drug industry, the FDA protects the pharmaceutical industry's profits by preventing competition from the natural health community. They do this by not allowing anyone to make any health claims stating a product diagnoses, prevents, treats, or cures a disease unless it's FDA approved. The problem is the approval process very expensive. The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development estimates it costs $2.6 billion to get a drug approved. While this isn't a deal breaker for pharmaceutical companies that intend to make much more than that off their drug, it's far out of the reach for anyone who wants to get a natural medicine approved. The reason why no one is willing to pay billions of dollars to have a natural medicine approved to treat cancer is because natural things like plants and herbs aren't patentable, and therefore aren't profitable. If you can't patent it, you can't recoup your investment so you won't do it. And unless you get it FDA approved, you can't use it to cure disease. You'd be practicing medicine without a license and using unapproved drugs. It's a very serious crime!
The thing that bugs me is that the people think the FDA is protecting them - it isn’t. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it’s doing are as different as night and day.” -Herbert L. Ley, Jr. (former Head of the FDA)

The FDA Passed GMOs Without Safety Testing

Not only does there seem to be a conflict of interest regarding the FDA's role in regulating drugs, but the same principle applies to the food industry too. One of the best examples of this is the revolving door with Michael Taylor going back and forth working for Monsanto and then directing the FDA. Monsanto is a multinational chemical company infamous for producing some of the world's most toxic chemicals, such as DDT, Agent Orange, and PCBs. They're now the world's leading producer of controversial genetically engineered seeds (GMOs) thanks to Michael Taylor giving it GRAS status (Generally Regarded As Safe). Normally, new additions to the food supply should be tested for safety before allowed to enter the marketplace. Since Michael Taylor just happened to be running the FDA at that time, he let it pass without requiring the typical testing. There is an obvious conflict of interest when Taylor worked as Monsanto's attorney, then heads the FDA and gives GMOs GRAS status, then goes back to work for Monsanto again. How can the attorney from a controversial chemical giant be allowed to run the regulatory agency that's supposed to be protecting us from companies like Monsanto? That's like the fox guarding the hen house! While this isn't directly related to the FDA making it illegal to cure disease, it definitely puts their purpose and agenda in question.

Fighting Medical Tyranny

People have been persecuted for curing disease and helping others regain their health. Of course, those people are always labeled as quacks. The FDA will attack healers for claiming to cure disease, even if their cure works! In the case of the walnut producers mentioned in the video above, the FDA isn't saying their statements aren't true. They're saying they can't say that unless it's approved by them. That means the FDA has exclusive rights over who can cure. And guess what, they're aren't curing anything! And since no one is legally allowed to claim to cure disease, almost everyone thinks there are no cures to these common diseases that are plaguing mankind. Yet there are alternative medical clinics that see people every day and have had great success. Why don't the news stations cover that story? They could easily go there and interview people and follow up with them. The mainstream medical community claims alternative medicine has no credibility, yet they don't interview patients after trying it, and they don't try alternative methods themselves, so how do they know?

Heroes Labeled As Quacks

Whenever someone claims to have found a solution for one of the major diseases they are always met with aggressive opposition from mainstream medical community and the governmental agencies that protect the status-quo of prescribing drugs and surgery. In the two videos below you will hear stories of some of the most prominent doctors who were attacked by the medical mafia. I put an excerpt from the video below on the left in my video at the very top, but Dr. Burzynksi's story is so compelling it's worth watching the video in its entirety, and then watching his full documentary titled Burzynski.


Holistic Doctors Showing Up Dead


Sadly, alternative doctors know how dangerous it is to go against the grain in our modern medical system. Successful alternative doctors are harshly criticized and ostracized from the medical community. They face overwhelming amounts of opposition, while being labeled as quacks. Even worse, alternative doctors have been showing up dead, often under suspicious circumstances. At the time of writing this, we've had at least 12 of them. Some of them are missing, some ruled out as suicides, and others murdered. You can learn more about the mysterious deaths of holistic doctors here. There was also a recent mass poisoning of 29 holistic practitioners. The story wreaks of foul play. Read more about it here.

Of the 12 dead doctors, perhaps Dr. Bradstreet is one of the most notable. He was an alternative doctor who claimed to have successfully treated 1,100 patients with a product known as GcMAF, a protein produced by the human body. According to Dr. Bradstreet, 85% of autistic children seen a significant improvement, while 15% were completely cured! About 80% of his cancer patients were cured with GcMAF! You'd think he would be celebrated as hero for curing cancer and autism. Far from it. The FDA raided his clinic like they did Dr. Burzynski and many others. Three days later Dr. Bradstreet was found dead in a river with a gunshot wound in the chest. It was ruled a suicide. The Bradstreet family has doubts and is currently raising funds to support a thorough investigation. That's a cause worth supporting!

Dr. Bradstreet shared the stage with other presenters at the annual Autism One conference where these brave speakers discuss how close they are to having a cure for autism. Kerri Rivera, one of the other speakers at Autism One and mother of a greatly improved/cured autistic kid, gave a great talk that outlines her protocol in her book. Her controversial protocol has had great success and is well-documented, with over 200 people who have completely eradicated their autism and thousands improved. There are lots of testimonials online, including videos and Amazon reviews of her book by parents of autistic kids who have experienced great results. You can hear about her protocol in the video below. There's even a young girl who was previously autistic who gives an eloquent, heart-touching speech at the end about the transformation the protocol has done for her.

 

When we have this much proof for cures of various diseases, from both doctors and countless patients from around the world, it's hard to disregard it all as being pseudoscience with no basis for legitimacy. They'd like us to believe these cures are merely anecdotal and that there are no cures so that way they can keep selling us their expensive patented medicine. Considering we've seen several cases of massive fraud from the pharmaceutical industry, an obvious conflict of interest shown by the revolving door between governmental agencies and the corporations they're supposed to be protecting us from, and now holistic doctors suspiciously being found dead from what appears to be top-level professional mafia-like hits in some cases, we have everything but a confession of giant conspiracy.

People are literally dying over this information, while others are dying because they don't have this information.

Please resteem!

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I want to thank everyone who reads this and I encourage you to watch the video at the top, at least, because it has content in there that isn't in the text.

Edit: I did some further looking into this and see that you are original author.
Sorry, but you can understand that I was trying to protect authors like yourself from being plagiarized.

As you can see, Cheetah left you a comment. That is a bot that looks for similar information elsewhere on the web and leaves a comment as a warning to others of possible plagiarism. You may lose votes if people suspect that it is not your own work.

Please make some sort of comment in the post that this is an older piece of your own work.

Normally, whenever we quote something found elsewhere on the web, or out of a book, we indicate that it is not our words by putting the > symbol in front of the quoted material. That way Cheetah will ignore it.

For example: >When we have .... (looks like below)

When we have this much proof for cures of various diseases, from both doctors and countless patients from around the world, it's hard to disregard it all as being pseudoscience with no basis for legitimacy.

Original Comment: This is totally cut and paste from another article.
None of these words are your own.
You did not even give credit to the real author.

You will get in trouble REAL quickly here on Steemit doing stuff like this.
The flags will start coming and your reputation # will tank quickly.

I'm a little confused about all this. Is there a post showing all the etiquette that needs to be known here on Steemit? I wouldn't have ever thought to add a >. Not that I needed to. Everything is my writing. The intro in the beginning of the video clearly show The Awareness Revolution. The main focus is that video. Everythign else below it is just supporting what I stated in the video.

So if I state in my posts that it's from an older post of mine, then the bots will take notice? The bot that commented upvoted, which is odd if you're suggesting that it was really giving me a plagarism warning. Also, the link's URL clearly has The Awareness Revolution in it. So you saw the bot say that but didn't notice the link is to my own website?

if there's anythign else I should know to avoid things like this in the future please let me know.

It is a big learning process, yes.
There are many of posts made by community members about the rules; and the biggest one is no plagiarism. Second would be no spamming.

Steemit is meant to be original content.

It is more than fine to link to someone else's video or content, but the person must put their own thoughts about it.

Here is a good video to watch for a start:

https://steemit.com/minnowsupportproject/@minnowsupport/community-posting-guidelines

I want to help you get noticed. I like what you write. I had wanted to vote, but then doubted whether you were the original author when I saw the Cheetah comment. Cheetah isn't saying that it is plagiarism, but is just one way for people to be more careful. Nobody wants to vote on plagiarized stuff, especially those people who have lots of voting power and could give you the most rewards.

You should probably add your Youtube channel in your profile as well, along with a description of what you are all about. Also mention on your youtube channel and website that you are on Steemit too. That way it's easier to know you are who you claim.

Anyways, you are allowed to post your own already-published articles over here on Steemit.
But it would be best to add a note to the top of bottom about how this is your original content, that has already been posted elsewhere on the web. Just make it quick and easy for people to tell so that they don't have to guess.

Ouch pretty harsh!! I'm SO glad you did the research to find out that @arevolution is legit. 😊 Thanks for looking out though!
What a great compliment that it was so good it looked copied! ❤

Gosh..food for thought! Keeping people sick for the sake of monetary rewards! Frightening what lengths people will go for money!

It is. They wouldn't be able to do it without government though. They use the FDA as a guise to put up a huge barrier for competition.

I knew this was happening, but it still burns me up to read it, and see all the evidence all over again. Thanks for sharing this!

You're welcome. Thanks for reading! I hope you watched the top video too. I give supporting information that isn't in the text.

I did finish watching the video just now. Very interesting information. Lots of new names I've never heard before..and to know the FDA gets to control our speech on the issue?? That's nauseating.

Yes it is. But I'd imagine if enough of us knew what they're up to we could change things. Hence, the reason I post about it. Thanks for watching the video. Bookmark it or something in case you ever need to explain to someone why these cures aren't allowed to surface.

Thank you for sharing!

Big Pharma doesn't need cured people, it needs patients.
Also, talking to my American friends I've come to the conclusion that it is just an illusion the US spends so much money on healthcare. It seems to me medical services are simply over-priced to create this illusion (and make some people very rich). Someone told me that for a one-day stay in the hospital the bill amounted to $27.000! For a nasty flu!

Yep. It's a scam. A big part of the reason why it's able to perpetuate is due to the fact that we're so disconnected from paying it. Most people don't pay out of pocket. They pay with insurance, medicare, or medicaid, and could care less what the hospital charges. This is yet another example of the government appearing to be trying to help but unintended consequences come along with it. If it were on a free market, that wouldn't happen. Big government is not the answer. It's the problem.

This is true. I have called the hospital and inquired about medical service prices, and also about billing. The first question the financial administrator always asks is: "Insurance, or cash price?" Seems they have a menu of services priced differently depending upon whether or not you pay in cash, out of pocket.
And I have a bill here somewhere that shows 1 single night's stay in "observation" in the E.R.
That bill is over $17,000 USD.
And they literally did nothing except watch me.

I noticed a possible inconsistency in your post, and I was wondering if you could clarify it for me. You write:

Normally, new additions to the food supply should be tested for safety before allowed to enter the marketplace. Since Michael Taylor just happened to be running the FDA at that time, he let it pass without requiring the typical testing.

However, you also berate the FDA for taking too long to approve certain drugs. Couldn't you argue that they are just being overly cautious?

Also, how is the FDA keeping other countries from doing research on drugs?

Hey, thanks for your comment. Good questions too. To be honest, I wrote this years ago. Where did I say the FDA takes too long to approve drugs? I skimmed it a few times and didn't see it. Maybe in the video? I"m not sure sorry.

I don't know as much about how other countries operate. But the FDA only has jurisdiction here in the US. However, the pharmaceutical companies are worldwide. Other countries do allow some natural things to be used as treatment for diseases. In that way some countries are more advanced than us. So if you're out of the country you can say "xyz herb" can be used to treat cancer (if in fact it is used for that there) but it's illegal to say the same thing here, in the land of the free.

For example, a lot of the medicinal mushrooms are used in conjunction with chemo and radiation in some other countries. It mitigates a lot of the harmful effects and even makes the treatment work better. But we don't do that here. So doctors can't do it, recommend it, and that's even if they know about it, which most don't. They only know what they're taught in school and are required by law to follow procedure or risk getting their license taken away.

Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
http://theawarenessrevolution.com/illegal-to-cure/

Great post, you can check mine too, some basic idea on breast cancer. Please upvoat and follow if possible. Would be a great encouragement. Thanks
https://steemit.com/health/@applesspatrick/breast-cancer-stay-healthy-stay-updated-and-stay-happy