Mercury in vaccines has been controversial for some time. Many people think they took the mercury out of all the vaccines but they didn't. While they did remove mercury from most of the childhood vaccines, mercury is still found in most of the flu shots given, which is bar far the best-selling vaccine. Since they recommend it to pregnant mothers, you'd think there would be plenty of scientific research clearly showing it to be safe to do so. Nothing could be farther from the truth!
It's shocking to find out how little research they've done on the toxicology of thimerosal in humans. Thimerosal is a preservative that's about 50% mercury. Mercury is a well known neurotoxin. The mercury you'll get from vaccines is ethylmercury, which they say ethylmercury is "broken down by the body differently and clears out of the blood more quickly."
What they don't say is that it's safer, or less toxic. How much of it goes to the brain? That's the real question. Why don't they tell us it doesn't go to the brain? Or that it doesn't harm the body whatsoever? If it's injected it can go straight through your blood into your brain, passing the blood brain barrier. They're not studying the effects on the body and that's what matters most. Not how quickly it clears out of the blood.
Adjuvants in Vaccines
Adjuvants are put into vaccines to stimulate an immune response. They're toxic. That's what they're there for. They're meant to grab the immune system's attention. The body needs the stimulation because it's not normal for pathogens to enter your body via a needle.
Methylmercury vs Ethylmercury
They say the adjuvants are safe. For example, they say the ethylmercury in the thimerosal preservative found in the flu shot is excreted out of the body faster than the methylmercury found in the environment, such as in fish. It is well established that methylmercury is very toxic. Ethylmercury, on the other hand, hasn't been studied nearly as much.
While the FDA admits they're "lacking definitive data" on the comparative toxicology between the two different types of mercury, the FDA considers them equivalent in its risk evaluation. If methylmercury well known to be very toxic, and the FDA considers the risks of the two kinds of mercury to be equivalent, why are they injecting ethylmercury into people?
Click here to see the full page on the FDA's website
Though they don't have definitive scientific studies comparing the toxicity between the two types of mercury, they're going to assume they're the same. The article goes on to mention one study that suggests the ethylmercury is excreted faster than they'd expect methylmercury to be excreted. They don't say that it is excreted faster, or that it's excreted without affecting the brain. They only say it was excreted faster than they'd expect methylmercury to be excreted. That means they didn't test it and compare it the two. They're just guessing. And this guesswork has lead thousands of people to assume ample research has been done in this field, though it has not.
Spread the Truth About Thimerosal
Very few people know there's almost no research showing the ethylmercury is safer to inject than methylmercury. Yet millions of trusting people allow themselves to be guinea pigs for the pharmaceutical industry. Watch the video at the very top of this page for more information. Read this document from the Congressional record about mercury in vaccines. Watch the documentary Trace Amounts.
Please resteem this to spread the message.
Sign up for our newsletter to stay updated!
Congratulations @arevolution! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You published 4 posts in one day
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit