Yeah, I know the FAQ from the CDC inside and out. But if you did read the inserts and risks then how can you say that vaccines can't possibly harm? I mean, the makers of these vaccines are even telling you in those inserts that they can, so how can you deny it? Especially since you are all hunky dory about the info they provide.
RE: Should We Really Be Giving Our Children Vaccines?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Should We Really Be Giving Our Children Vaccines?
From earlier:
Sure doesn't feel like it at this point with how much effort you've committed so far.
As predicted, dismissed.
I didn't say they couldn't possibly harm. It's just that the risks aren't enough to avoid vaccines or even spread/delay them. You're simply misinformed.
The difference between us is I could be convinced otherwise with proper evidence. That's how science works. It's not based on faith or gut feelings.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well, you told me that if I believe that vaccines could possibly harm that I was wrong, your words, not mine. So with that you were definitely saying there were no risks. I don't base anything on faith or gut feelings. Like I said: I used to be paid to cover up...that's a hard and terrible fact for me, and something I have to live with. And from that point, I know for 100% surety that doctors, scientists, and anyone who has anything to do with the approval or continuance of any medication or vaccine are also paid and bribed to cover this up. Yeah, of course not all, but either way: these BILLION dollar companies get their way. I have never said that vaccines could have never saved lives, because I know that at some stage, there are and always have been people who are actually trying to help people, but I DO think it is important for people to be informed properly and receive an insert BEFORE vaccination. And as far as it goes about me committing the amount of effort that I spent on this so far: yes, I am passionate about what I believe in and will never apologise for that. And again: the AMOUNT of vaccines given at once is unreal. It is more than an adult should get, let alone a baby. And there is a tetanus shot given here in Ireland at 2 and 3 months. Do you really think that's necessary unless the child lives on the ground and can get into contact with anything rusty or dirt that could give it tetanus? Sorry, but from raising 4 children, I know for a fact that these worries won't come up until much later. And even then, there are things one can do to prevent it from happening. Like: not let a toddler play with rusty nails. There is no denying this, tetanus could be given later, without any problems...ever. So if you still think that all these vaccinations need to be given at the same time, then you're worse off than I thought. The fluoride is working...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Got it. Fluoride.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh, just one more thing: I didn't dismiss the CDC FAQ at all, what I said was that I KNOW it inside and out. A student won't read a book that he already knows, would he? Neither would I, unless new content gets added.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit