Smoking is one of the main causes of lung cancer. Those who smoke 2 to 3 packets of cigarettes daily or smoke for 20-30 years daily, 90 percent of them are at risk of lung cancer. So those who do not smoke, are they absolutely safe? Non-smokers may also be lung cancer. Even women are at risk. Do not smoke, do not neglect some symptoms, it is not.
Environmental and workplace contamination, vehicle fumes may cause lung cancer. So protect yourself from the smoke of burning wood or coal burning or traffic. It is good to use a mask while working in the industry.
Women and non-smokers have different types of cancer. Indirect smoking can also cause others to be cancerous.
Signs of lung cancer are several days of cough, bleeding with cough, fever, weight loss etc. However, some unfamiliar symptoms may also cause lung cancer. For example, the voice changes. Moderate cough type of smoker or bronchitis patient changes Chest or shoulder pain. Only 50 percent of patients can go to the doctor only with chest or shoulder pain. A sign that pneumonia or lung infection can be frequent.
Coughing cough or shortness of breath can also be symptoms. Many times we neglect them for allergies or asthma.
Cancer of other parts of the body can be spread in the lungs. Breast, colon, prostate cancer spreads more in the lungs. If there is a history of such a disease, no symptoms of lungs can be neglected.
Yes non-smokers do get lung cancer. Some of them from second-hand smoke. It's best not to be around others when they are smoking. It will reduce your chances of lung cancer.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes bro@johnwjr7
You are also right. One thing those who smoke they should not smoke in public places it is prohibited by law and at the same time they should give up smoking. We all should aware of industrial pollution, vehicle pollution these also causes lung cancer. Children are at very risk of these pollution. So we should always keep safe children from these pollution.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Agree 100%. What burns me is that we have the technology to get rid of most, maybe all, these pollutants, but we continue using them. It's helping to kill or, at least, seriously impede our future generations.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah i agree with you. Technology give us all tools but who are resresponsible for implementing , they are not using it. So law and enforcement should be more strict.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by rafiquliubat016 from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews/crimsonclad, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows and creating a social network. Please find us in the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP. Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Resteemed by @resteembot! Good Luck!
Curious?
The @resteembot's introduction post
Get more from @resteembot with the #resteembotsentme initiative
Check out the great posts I already resteemed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit