LASIK Surgery May be Safer Than Contact Lens Use in the Long Term

in health •  8 years ago  (edited)

ThinkstockPhotos-618976102.jpg


Introduction


For many years I used to wear contact lenses but I was never quite comfortable putting a foreign body in my eye.

ThinkstockPhotos-475428896.jpg

Contact lens

They can become quite uncomfortable towards the end of the day, have a tendency to fall out and get lost (particularly in dry air) and there is the ever present risk of infection/damage to the cornea.

Despite these risks the traditional view has been that contact lens use is "safer" than LASIK (the commonest type of Laser correction surgery).

A new meta-analysis study suggests that this may not be correct at least when it comes to long term infection risk.

The study from the "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery" by Masters et al [1] suggests that LASIK has a lower long term risk for developing microbial keratitis (MK) than wearing contact lenses.

You can read the study or download it for free here.


What is Microbial Keratitis


The Moorfields Eye Hospital has a useful description [2]:

ThinkstockPhotos-498528104 (1).jpg

Microbial keratitis is an infection on the cornea – the clear window on the front of the eye. It is often related to contact lens
wear or, less commonly, due to a scratch on the surface of the eye or a pre-existing eye condition. Infection is more likely with incorrect contact lens cleaning or storage, incorrect use of disposable lenses or wearing lenses overnight. Microbial keratitis can be a serious condition if not treated and can sometimes affect your vision and may leave a scar, even with the correct treatment.

Just to be clear MK is is more serious and presents greater risks than the more common and generally milder type of eye infection "conjunctivitis" (AKA "pink eye").

Improper use of contact lens is one of the most common causes [1]:

The burden of microbial keratitis, and specifically microbial keratitis associated with contact lens wear, has more recently come forth. With approximately 38 million contact lens wearers in the United States, there were an estimated 1 million clinical visits secondary to microbial keratitis and contact lens–related ICD-9 codes in the year 2010.

It doesn't just occur with contact lens use though. Any kind of injury to the surface of the eye can be complicated by MK.

This includes accidental injury or eye surgery such as LASIK.


Methods


The authors performed a literature search on PubMed (a medical research database) to look for studies that covered contact lens use/MK and LASIK/MK.

ThinkstockPhotos-78481521.jpg

LASIK (artist impression)

Studies with a sample size of at least 1000 cases were then used to create a Meta-Analysis. This is a type of analysis that involves collating the results of multiple studies.

It is not quite as good as doing one massive study but as I have discussed in the past that is really not feasible in most cases due to cost limitations.

A meta-analysis provides a compromise solution.

Nine studies of contact lens use (1998-2008) were used and nine studies for LASIK (1999-2015).


Results


The main finding is that LASIK has a lower rate and hence risk of MK than contact lens use in the long term (5-10 years).

Screenshot 2017-04-24 15.43.49.png

The advantage with LASIK is greatest when comparing to extended wear contact lenses - something which one would expect.

The results within the first year are more mixed (see Table 4 in paper) - this also to be expected as this is the post surgical period.

It should also be noted that some of the results did not reach statistical significance as often happens in medical research.


Problems


This paper has a nice summary of some of the major problems with their analysis and I would recommend reading this section if you are interested in the subject (p70-72).

ThinkstockPhotos-669506388.jpg

Problems

One of the biggest problem from my point of view is that the amount of data is limited, particularly when it comes to LASIK.

This is to be expected because many more people use contact lenses than have LASIK eye surgery.

LASIK is also a more recent technology and as a result there is a smaller population of patients to gather statistics and perform research on.

When one is dealing with incidences that are in some cases only double figures this can present a problem for statistical analysis.

In addition we must consider some of the limitations that occur with meta-analyses in general. One of these is that the individual issues, limitations and problems with each study used in the analysis may interact in unforeseen ways.

That is one of the reasons why the ideal situation would be to do a single large scale study to assess the risks - although as I have discussed before this is not usually possible due to cost.

A further issue we must consider is that both contact lens and LASIK/eye surgery technology is constantly advancing.

This might mean that new advancements could shift the balance in terms of risk.

It is also important to mention that although MK is a major and serious complication it is not the only one for LASIK surgery or wearing contact lenses.

The variation in spectrum of complications means that a direct or exact comparison of risk between the two types of treatment may not be possible.

Finally I should also make it clear that I am not an ophthalmologist so there may well be things that I have missed here.

If you happen to be reading this and you are an ophthalmologist I would love to hear your educated opinion on this research.


Conclusion


As someone who has had LASIK surgery and previously used to wear contact lenses the findings here are very interesting.

ThinkstockPhotos-486856955.jpg

The idea that long term contact lens use is more risky than LASIK certainly makes sense.

LASIK is (in most cases) a one off procedure and exposure to eye injury/infection.

On the other hand wearing contact lenses involves placing a foreign body on the surface of the eye for extended periods of time for as long as you use them.

As someone who is also diabetic (and so at higher infection risk) - MK was a serious concern when I was making my decision.

This research might help to reassure people who are hesitating about undergoing LASIK surgery for this reason.

It does not mean it is 100% safe but then no surgery is.


Thank you for reading



References


  1. Masters, Jordan, Mehmet Kocak, and Aaron Waite. 2017. “Risk for Microbial Keratitis: Comparative Metaanalysis of Contact Lens Wearers and Post-Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Patients.” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 43 (1): 67–73.

  2. Hingorani, Melanie, Swan Kang, and Linda Langton. 2014. “Microbial Keratitis - Patient Information Leaflet.” Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. http://www.moorfields.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/a-e-microbial-keratitis.pdf.



All uncredited images are taken from my personal Thinkstock Photography account. More information can be provided on request.



Steemithelp.net

Are you new to Steemit and Looking for Answers?

Please visit:

Steemithelp.net

A collection of guides and tutorials that cover the basics of Steem and Steemit.


Follow me on Steemit & Twitter. Connect on LinkedIn and Facebook. Join the Life Extension and Anti-Aging Technology Group and the Steemit Group on LinkedIn. Get the Markdown version of the Steemithelp Footer to add to your own posts here. Let's get STEEM on Coinbase: THIS POST shows you how.


Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Thank you so very much for sharing this information as it has been a question of mine for many years now as I have often considered the laser surgery weighing in the fact that contacts also take their toll on our organ.

Namaste :)

Thanks - glad you like it:)

Great post! I had laser eye surgery about 5 years ago. Not only is it affordable when you consider how much you spend on contacts and glasses over 25 years, but it enhanced my vision to 20/15. The world became much clearer than any contact lens or a pair of glasses could ever achieve.

Cool - same for me. My vision is now better than 20/20 and the biggest difference for me is when I am driving at night I can see so much better than I could with glasses or contact lenses. Obviously it is surgery so people need to consider the risks but I think in the long term it is better than constantly sticking contact lenses in your eyes and it is pays for itself within a few years like you said. It is like having my childhood vision and clarity back.

Everyone that has had the procedure that I've talked to has raved about the results (mostly elderly). I had cataract surgery about 3 years ago and they put a corrective lens in and it's unbelievable. I can see as good as I could at 19... hell, I could go back to sniping lol!

Lol yes - I have watched quite a few cataract replacements in person and they are amazing. I think the biggest thing with any eye operation or procedure is the fear factor.

Yeah...when the Dr said I was going to be awake I was pretty afraid! But all went well, it was a pain wearing a protective shield for a while though.

Yes I think the anticipation is worst!

I wear the old type glass gas permeable contact lenses, which are apparently better than the new disposable type. I once went to try and get laser correction, but at the time they said, my eyes are not right for it. (This was about 20 years ago and I am wearing contacts for about 30 years). Technology and my eye might have changed in this time, perhaps I must try to get it done again.

It is worth finding out I think since these things are constantly advancing.

20 years is a long time, long time when it comes to improvements in technology and what it can do. And with little checking I found that LASIK was approved 1999 in USA. I'd give it a go if I were you.

I've had my dad go through the procedure and it was fast and painless. And to what I know, he's been happy with it.

Thank you for the advice, I will try it again

I have to convince my gf to do it. She is constantly in pain due to contacts.

I'm definitely glad I had it done but it is not without risks.

Hey @thecryptofiend thanks for sharing your finds on this its something I have often thought about, if I had to pick I would want to do Lasik rather then contacts but probably like many have the fear something may go horribly wrong.

Thanks - that is what made me hold off for so long as well. What finally made me take the plunge was when I had to stop using contact lenses due to them causing infections and various problems with my eyes (being a diabetic) - even though it raised the short term risk of having similar problems I wagered that it was better in the long term.

I also wanted to make sure I got it done before I reached the stage when I needed reading glasses.

I think the important thing is getting it done through a reputable provider who will investigate you thoroughly to see if you are suitable so that the risks are minimised as much as possible before you have the surgery and won't pressure you if you are not.

Filled with lots of useful info, your article gives a ​detailed overview of​ the subject. Highly recommended.

Thank you:)

Funny idea, this laser we are going to shoot in your eye is the safer way :p.

They don't actually shoot it into your eye though - just the cornea!

Well I hope not :p. Oh I'm sure its pretty safe, just the idea of it.

I did Lasik surgery almost 7 years and I am very satisfied about it. I couldn't see without glasses and I couldn't wear contact lenses. It is getting safer and safer everyday because of new technologies but there are a lot of people who are scared about that and prefer to wear contact lenses. Anyways thank you for the information.

I think people tend to be squeamish about anything involving their eyes.

I know lasik is more for short-sighted historically and my wife has been wearing contacts for years. Age is catching up with us. Wonder if it's safe for presbyopia too.

I don't know - it would be best to get a consultation - most places here in the UK do it for free so if you can get a free consultation she has nothing to lose.

Oh that's good. I don't think we get free consultation even in public clinic

If you ever visit the UK - you could get a free consultation while you are here. It is done through private opticians like Optical Express or Optimax.

Oh, our optical shops have them and will check eyesight for free but the doctors ones including those who the do lasik surgery were the ones I thought we should go for the check.

Over here it is the same kind of shops that also do the basic testing and then send you on to the doctor for further consultation.

Bit similar then. Just that I thought these shops are more interested to get you to make a pair of glasses or supply you the contact lens.

Depends on the shop. We have a couple of chains here that do both.

You seem to know what you are talking about, but I'm skeptical. I tend to get all of my scientific information from reputable sources like the Simpsons.

Lol:)

good to know :)

Thanks glad you liked it:)

Contacts are such a pain in the ass to use. I had to stop using them since I rarely got them out easily and it was such a fight. It probably was all down to my bad technique but it just wasn't for me. Seems like I actually managed to damage my eye due to fighting with contacts so never touching them again.

That is a big problem I had too - sometimes I had real trouble getting them out and your eyes are not really meant to be touched by anything on a regular basis - I felt like I was man-handling them on a near daily basis! One of the things that finally put me off was seeing some of the complications that people would come into hospital with as a result of them. LASIK is not perfect but by common sense it is a one shot risk or as close to it as you can get.

I know that feeling all too well. When I was total beginner with contact lenses, I actually managed to break them in to pieces while trying to get them out. That was a very lovely experience.

That happened to me too a couple of times - it is pretty scary.

Great post. I had lasik surgery several years ago, worked awesome. Love not wearing glasses anymore

Yes it is certainly liberating!

had LASIK in december 2016, best thing i ever did. now i can see like an eagle. no pain, no problems at all. my insurance even paid for the surgery.
as soon to be a doctor myself, i encourage you to do it!

I already had it:)

well done sir! i encourage every reader of the comments: let them laserz burn your eyes!

Whilst I would recommend it - I would also suggest people weigh up the risks very carefully. No surgical procedure is without risk. Unlike contact lenses there aren't really any risks to your vision from wearing spectacles so people need to take that into consideration.

well, the risks here are extremely low when weighed up against the result. if you carefully follow the "dripping-plan" , risks like infection are not an issue any more. but when you have a thin cornea, thats when i would think twice.
no risks wearing spectacles? run into a tree, fall of a bike or get hit in the face. thats when you potentially can become blind wearing spectacles.

Well low risks wearing spectacles. Nothing is completely without risk!