If the $1 vote was a single vote from a single account, then yes, the non-linear curve would give a different result by design. This will hopefully prevent comment farming and self-voting we see which leaves more of the rewards pool for valuable content. If it was a number of votes, then I think you'll begin to approach the same amount as previously. See the deep dive for details and examples: https://steemit.com/steem/@vandeberg/reward-curve-deep-dive
The end result is, yes, I think the author rewards per post will go down. If that's too much of a problem, people may want to try other experiments like https://palnet.io or do what I suggested in my post and hide the $$$ to figure out what motivates you to be here.
Thanks for the info!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hey Luke. Does the number of votes matter? Wouldn't it be the same payout irrespective?
Otherwise people would just split up their large accounts into smaller ones, which negates the point of the CLRC change.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The number of stake weighted votes matter, as far as I understand. The stake part is important.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit