It is very similar to the effect of linear or convergent linear.
It was very different. The day the fork happened the change in the payout made this very clear.
RE: HF21: What Makes Steem Valuable?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
HF21: What Makes Steem Valuable?
Disagree. There were some differences in particular payouts yes, but the payouts before the experiment were in a different universe altogether.
Let me ask you another question. If n^2 as proposed in the original white paper was such a great thing then why is no one going and creating a new system using it? Why is Voice not using it?
I doubt I will be able to convince you but most rational people, probably including Dan, have concluded that the original Steem white paper just got a lot wrong (not even necessarily a lot of separate things, but the things it got wrong are very important). It was a legitimate and mostly credible attempt, but after trying things we learn from them, at least most of us do.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I've been saying that I'm of pretty much in favor of any curve that gets us away from linear. I never said n^2 was the best.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ah, fair enough.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit