It always comes down to money, wealth, and power at the top echelons.

Kuhn, Loeb, Bernard Baruch, J.P. Morgan, Eugene Meyer;
Paul Warburg, Max Warburg, Jacob Schiff, Louis Brandeis, Alfred Rothschild
http://www.revisionist.net/hysteria/bankers.html

I’ve read things claiming it was international (globalist) bankers that pushed British politicians and later US politicians in WWI. If true, the bankers needed the US in WWI otherwise they would have lost huge amounts of money if Germany prevailed. WWII certainly wouldn’t have been what it was if Germany was victorious in WWI, while the same bankers or their successors would have benefitted from WWII as well.

Also strange is how the establishment historians on the victors side, claim the beginnings of WWI were “too complicated” to be certain how it all started. Coincidentally or not, the “too complicated” narrative was favorable to the behind the scenes powers that are the major financiers as the bankers were.

I think it always comes down to money, wealth, and power at the top echelons. Whomever controls the money decides who gets a share of the money through bribes, coercion, campaign funding and otherwise career opportunities and or kickbacks of various sorts.

If all the censored facts were factored in and all distortions and lies were factored out of our equations for determining how we arrived at these current circumstances, possibly half of the conclusions in the Western narratives would amount to nothing but more propaganda designed to keep the collective Western public from knowing the truth.