History is a mystery... We are constantly learning how little we actually know...

in history •  8 years ago  (edited)

steemit.jpg
We often learn or discover something that shakes the very foundation of what we know. Sometimes people will try to conceal or hide these discoveries as upsetting our world view tends to make all of us uncomfortable. In this sense history is not only written by the victors, it is is also kept static by some people who would prefer certain discoveries never be shared. They would prefer we stick with the history we were taught.

I just wrote a post an hour or so ago about colonizing planets and getting off of Earth. That was partially inspired by an article I read earlier today.

I actually have been aware of Gobekli Tepe for a couple of years, and have even mentioned it in one of my @chaospoet poems that I wrote months ago.

This is one of those Archaeological digs that is causing many people to rethink many things about our past. If they do not rethink them then they would be forced to pretend that which they are unearthing does not exist. They need to apply a very liberal amount of mental white out so that this particular dig does not do this.

Yet it is not the only such site to do this... There are a growing number of odd discoveries that cause us to questions what we claim to know about our past. It is interesting that as we discover new things that effectively prove the written history is wrong I do not see the actual history books as being taught being rewritten or edited for accuracy. They still teach the same things and ignore anything that would show that world view as inaccurate.

This is a bad thing for our future. We should embrace and welcome facts. Our understanding of what the "truth" is should change with the discovery of new facts. If we do not do this then we simply are living a lie, and we are spreading and teaching lies.

An interesting NEW idea in that article about Gobekli Tepe above (it is clickable by the way) is this idea that a disaster related to passing through a meteor stream could explain a lot of the Ice Age about 11,000 years ago which killed off various species, and appears as though may have impacted human civilizations that were far more advanced than history likes to teach.

This is potentially important as we are supposedly due to cross through this meteor stream again around 2030. Is this another doomsday prophecy? Not at all. Just simple science and observation of our solar system. Will a doomsday event occur? That is not certain at all, but the Earth will be at an increased danger of impacts from the norm. No such impacts may happen, but they are more probable than during other times.

It would be nice if we have a larger presence outside of our planet by then either with drones, or human colonies. We may be in a position to do something or at least react to such events.

Gobekli Tepe is not the only discovery that has us questioning what we know about the past. There are many more.

A pretty obvious one is that they still teach Columbus discovering America which there are numerous sites that have been dug and found that prove the Vikings beat him to it. If you go with some of the other archaeology there is also some evidence that other cultures may have been here as well. At the very least we know the Vikings were here first. Yet, Columbus is still taught as though these discoveries did not occur.

Here are links to some articles on some other interesting discoveries and places that defy what we know of history(titles may be sensational clickbait and because I share them does not mean I agree with the speculation about these things):

This next one was from a time when supposedly man could not work this type of metal







Conclusion


There are probably more than a hundred enigmas out there probably several hundred. There are more speculations about what these enigmas are to go along with that. They go from early explorers being more adept than we historically give them credit for, to ancient aliens interacting with civilizations, to tales of Atlantis. There are also more humble speculations to try to explain it as offered by skeptics. At this point we do not know which is true, all we know is that the history we were taught is no longer accurate in many cases.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I still don't understand how South American Natives could build such things without metal tools and the wheel. Makes more sense that they didn't and someone else did.

There are really only two possibilities that I see. 1) What you said, and what is covered by Ancient Aliens hypothesis, and 2) That they had knowledge that has since been lost.

There is some indicator they may actually have known how to make a substance from plants and some other things that would temporarily soften rock. That could account for the perfect shaping and not require anything more than lost knowledge.

Yet then we still need to know how they moved the huge stones and there is some hints that the coral castle builder (google it) knew how to move massive stones by himself and he claimed to be using forgotten knowledge, but he never passed it on that I know.

So either SOMEONE ELSE, or FORGOTTEN KNOWLEDGE are the only things that make sense that I can think of.

In the case of Columbus, trying to make a new rhyme to replace 'in 1492 Columbus sailed the ocean blue". in some unknown year, by some unknown bloke? the mind boggles.
Even simple things like who was first to fly an aeroplane, once you have got the Wright Bros in print it is impossible to replace them by a back country farmer, in a far flung, almost unheard of country that beat them by at least 9 months, probably 18 months, there is doubt about the exact date that Richard Pearse actually flew.
When I left school mumble mumble years ago the most lasting thing I remember is "Find out 'what is', and you will know truth" .
It holds true today.

Yes, though that is us humans being lazy. We could replace them, it just is hard. We tend to prefer the easy path. ;)

The more sensationalist a Daily Mail headline, the more skeptical I am.

Headlines don't mean much to me. I read content and make my own mind. I also recognize when what they are saying is speculation, and I judge it as speculation. That doesn't mean it is wrong, but it also doesn't prove it is right. All ideas begin as speculations as it is essentially the hypothesis stage in the scientific method. The problem is that a lot of people jump straight from that stage to treating it like a theory/fact without bothering with any of the intervening stages.