Rhetorical question. How would you respond in when your funds get frozen in the first place. Are you really not getting that?? All of this was never on the table IF your (ex) witnesses didn't freeze JS his funds. Its that simple. Its up to the PRESENT witnesses to protect the chain and its token. And they are doing that by blocking transfers. If someone makes a ´typo´(not saying it is) or whatever with his own account, its not the responsibility of the witnesses to fix that. If I transfer to the wrong person, Steemit will not help me, nor a witness, or an update. Why would we have to put risk on the chain when not necessary?