The fact is, a kind of 'Central Committee' excluded those who were against them. The exclusion was the true identity of deformed decentralization.
RE: 찜찜함이 남은 Hive의 분기, 그리고 스팀과 한국 커뮤니티가 해야할 일
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
찜찜함이 남은 Hive의 분기, 그리고 스팀과 한국 커뮤니티가 해야할 일
The real fact is: Not everyone agreed, yet there was enough of a majority to go through with the decision. A way to appeal the decision was also implemented. From there a broader section of the community can decide who, out this list of exclusions, can successfully obtain an airdrop. The list of exclusions was never to be interpreted as a final decision. What was required of those on the exclusion list was patience and professionalism. But instead, we got outrage and misinterpretation.
Please note. I do not represent those who made the decision to include an exclusion list. I simply base my logic on facts and common sense. No political stance whatsoever.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
For security reasons, I feel it would be unwise to include those accounts actively participating in a Sybil attack. One of the main reasons to hardfork and split was to stop the Sybil attack. If you include those actively participating in a Sybil attack, they might do it again and the hardfork split becomes pointless. Simple, common sense.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Criteria on participating Sybil attack was too low in this case, voting for two Justin's witnesses. It could be 10 to 15 which has meaningful impact.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes or no. Was there participation in a Sybil attack?
There's no place in between. The politics were meaningless and destructive. Impossible to answer both yes and no. Answering both yes and no is flawed logic.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I wished we Kr ccould satisfy both, or at least could bring peaceful coexistence. Dichotomy is simple and efficient but sometimes generates more conflicts than necessary. I still hope both to succeed :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Everyone on all sides learned a hard lesson. Now it's time to move on. Hopefully with respect.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Totally agreed with your last sentence. 👍
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit