And yet there are people who liked these changes.
How many people liked the idea of the chain being destroyed?
Maybe there should finally be some debate? Unless there's always a "master" ruling the "plebs" and it's not worth talking about.
Look, if Steem were to be dismantled and the code ported to the Tron blockchain as a set of smart contracts, then none of use would have any power over anything. Because the Tron foundation has complete control over Tron blockchain, we'd be at the complete mercy of Justin Sun. That if anything is master ruling over plebs if anything. Is that what you really want? Because that's what you get if you stab the community in the back by voting for Justin Sun who is trying to turn Steem into a centralized network.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
DPoS was chose because of its better scalability.
But I think you have a better chance of getting more people on board with your initiative to increase decentralization now.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Steem is not going to adopt PoS. That's not what I meant. I meant the other measures you suggested.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think a bridge to do two-way swaps between the chains would be a good thing. Any two chains should be able to connect that way.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit