I am dissapointed to what the referees did for users in this nitrous. They are the killer of mood. It is good to prevent platform from spammers and the investors will trust SPORTS. But how the referees can do anything they like to cancel the rewards of some contents created ny using the application rum on Steem Blockchain?
Dlike and Actifit are two application we can use to create the contents and referees thought both of the application are not good for this platform. It is not correct at all. Users created the contents from the proof of works and they wrote some words to complete the rules. Indeed there were some of them toke the words from other site such as Youtube, but not all the Dlikers and Actifitters did that kind of shit.
I had a plan to stake 50M SPORTS but I changed my mind because of the referees. They are very fucking special people that made the Sportstalksocial death.
Why were they not happy to look at the rewards of a post with 50 words?
This platform won't be adopted by other content creators anymore and the market of SPORTS in Steem Engine will die too.
The founder must evaluate what referees did for users if he does not want to let this platform say goodbye to Steem users. You know there are many scotbot tribes on Steem Blockchain and not only Sportstalksocial.