Contest – Easter Egg #3 : AI The Easter Egg

I address all my dear moderators, administrators, and whoever else looks after the AI-related concerns on this great platform.

  
I had been reading through a couple of posts by different experienced moderators and administrators that claimed that they found AI generated content.

I know it's possible to create content using ChatGpt-type tools, but do you really believe the tools you use are reliable or tell you the whole truth?

For instance, I typed

"I am an engineer"

And checked it on a tool https://corrector.app/ai-content-detector/

It said my content was 99.15% fake. I laughed out loud and added,

"and master of management."

The result said your content was 86.85 percent fake.

Funny, isn't it? AI has doubts that I am neither an engineer nor masters in management.

I am sure if you check this content, which I am writing right now, it will be declared fake too. So, I suggest we look at each and every piece of content from a human angle and use our common sense about the possibilities of fake and human-generated content.

I am writing this because one of my own posts was declared 50% AI generated and had nothing but all my personal achievements or incidents that I had personally passed through.

Image mine

I have been a writer, moderator, and online editor for the last 12-plus years, although I am no longer doing so on any website apart from moderating a community on Steemit and running a community of my own off and on right now because I have no time to do so.

I can tell you if a piece of content has been copied or plagiarized based on the user's writing ability. Still, if we become victims of AI in trying to catch AI-generated content, it will not only be unfortunate but also unfair to creative writers.

I request all those concerned to read every piece of content very carefully and see every piece of content in its right perspective rather than becoming victims of technology.

So what I am suggesting is that if you see a member giving you their personal experiences and your detector finds them fake, think again. But if you see some Williams, Wordsworth, or Shakespeare-like content from a member who can barely write two sentences correctly in their comments, go for it and check them thoroughly. I don't think this technology is 100 percent reliable.

You must be thinking why am I writing this post? For a simple reason, today, I created 3 articles and checked them on this tool and all of them were 85 to 99% fake. I think AI will soon declare all of our personal thoughts fake in future.

Maybe if you ask them. "Is there existence of God?"
And what you get for an answer is, "Yes, I'm the God, this is my resurrection."

Cheers!I hope you all had a great Easter Sunday!!!

I invite @josevas217 for his expert opinion