Steemit Crypto Academy Contest Season 3 Week 4 [Summary] - Cryptocurrency Trading

Introduction

The fourth week of the engagement challenge, which took place from August 8 to August 14, 2022, ended to end the third season of this competition in full success. In this report, we will summarize all the data we had during this period regarding your participation in the competition organized by the Steemit Crypto Academy community which aimed to study the main topics related to crypto tarding.

As mentioned earlier, the theme of the fourth week contest was tarding in the cryptocurrency market, in which users were asked to give their opinion on the following points:

Discuss in your own words what is cryptocurrency trading? And tell us what type of trader are you or do you see it more effective? Justify your answers.
Have you tested several time units? What Timeframe and Crypto Asset Pairs Are Best for You? Why?
To acquire some trading experience, it is important to trade regularly. Have you had regular trading activity over the last few months? Tell us what you learned from this experience. ( eg: Over the long term, do your gains exceed your losses? Do you have a method of recording and reviewing your trades to improve your performance? refined your trading system after being dissatisfied with its results?)
What impact does artificial intelligence have on crypto trading in the short and long term? Have you used before or want to handle an automatic trading robot? Tell us the causes of your choice.

In general, we received good publications this week in terms of quality of content, despite the number of participation was not up to our expectations, perhaps this drop is explained by the degree of difficulty of this subject which was more high compared to the past weeks and we hope to discover other competent participants in the coming seasons. So without talking too much, we go directly to the stats and nominations.

Statistics of the Participation

In this fourth week, we checked a total of 35 entries which were not all accepted because they did not meet all the conditions of participation. Below is a summary table that categorizes these entries.

Total Entries	Invalid Entries	Plagiarized Content
34	5	1

_{Scores Distribution}

_{Performance Distribution (%)}

From the performance graph above, good scores dominated with 64%, followed by average scores with 12%. Of the total number of entries, 3% hit the excellent domain, and 3% also hit the below-average items. On the other side, plagiarized and invalid entries are 3% and 15% respectively.

Top 3 Users for the Week

We have chosen the top 3 articles in the community, these articles were selected based on merits and their engagement with other users. In essence, excellent performance in terms of scores is the first criteria for selection followed by their interaction with other participants' entries.

We encourage users to work more on making quality content to make it to the excellent category and those with these high scores should interact with as many articles as possible. See the table below for the selection of top users in the order of their interaction with other participants.

Ranking	Username	Article
1	@steemdoctor1	Link
2	@simonnwigwe	Link
3	@abialfatih	Link

Conclusion :

At the end of this adorable second season, we can only appreciate the efforts of the users who participated in this fourth week and we invite everyone to ensure that their articles are checked in complete transparency. And for users who deliberately commit plagiarism, they are muted within the academy and we hope this will serve as an example for everyone; so let's make the STEEM ecosystem healthy through our collective efforts. Thanks.

Cc:-
@steemitblog