Sometimes this platform doesn’t act like a decentralized platform. You initiate a hashtag #club5050 and make it compulsory for everyone to participate those not participating will not get upvotes from either the curators either. Now the questions is the newbies that will be joining how so you expect them to get the upvotes to power up

When you go round instructing users of the the steem curator04 and booming accounts to only vote those successfully participating in club5050. How then will they get votes. The team even when further to add another rule of 150 minimum are you trying to get rid of us or bring more people?? If it’s to bring more people into the platform you are doing The opposite.

Actually Steemit CryptoAcademy and steemit in general was very exciting until you set some rules and then you set another rule that make it impossible for users to get to for example how can someone who is not getting vote successfully get up to a rep of 50.??

And you also say no not voting common you think about it. This is not a centralized platform where you can just wake up and set rules if you don’t abide by you will be penalized or if so I think you should start deleting the accounts of people not participating in the #club5050 because everything now evolves around this initiative☹️. I know you are gonna ignore but I have said my peace and I think all the users need to do same. Am very disappointed
Cc @steemcurator01 @steemcurator02 @sapwood