RE: Crypto Academy Season 4 Beginner Course - Task 2: STEEM & TRON by @emma55

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Crypto Academy Season 4 Beginner Course - Task 2: STEEM & TRON by @emma55

in hive-108451 •  3 years ago 

Now please tell me how are you going to know how many of my reputation is bought vote and the one that is not upvote that is bought because it is clearly not all my post that i have written that has a paid upvote but i understand what you are trying to say but every one has done it even the big accounts on steemit do it all the time then why is it a bad thing for small account who wants to grow it juat doesn't make sense

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

even the big accounts on steemit do it all the time then why is it a bad thing for small account who wants to grow it juat doesn't make sense

Big accounts may be doing that, but they are not participating in SCA. It is a rule in SCA and if they will participate it will be applicable for them also.

Thank you.

I thought this rule is supposed to help the steemit in general

Why only SCA? 😂

In general, also, Steemit does not support those users who take the help of Bot.

Steemit is crystal clear in its approach and that is, they discourage bot use in general.

Thank you.

  ·  3 years ago (edited)

In which way and form has steemit come for those rules.

In all the steemit community i have been writing and contributing it has never been a problem.

What of those users who delegated steem to @steemitcurator01 for upvotes so this rule is really hash

This community was created according to @steemitblog to help young bloggers to teach and learn about cryptocurrency that means every one who can remain original without cheating like copying but suddenly this new rules really look rediculouse because it seems like you are stopping people from participating on purpose which is really weird and anything you say seems to stand even though you are not @steemitblog.

Then i am done with steemit

I am responding within the capacity of Professor and within the ambit of laid out rules and guidelines.

I am not dictating any terms on my own.

Thank you.

Rules which you laid because it was not laid by @steemitblog

You can ask @steemitblog if you doubt it.

Thank you.

They are not responding

Thank you 😂😂

In their weekly publication they have stated that you can participate as a newcomer if you meet the reputation of 55 and SP of 200.

They haven't stated how the reputation should be gotten so this rule was all you

I am very sure you have used a voting bot before @sapwood and i will make sure i unravel it because i don't understand this rule still @sapwood

You are free to investigate.

Good Luck.

Ok and if i ruin other people chance of writting what do i get @sapwood

So anybody that is found with a bot vote i will report it and just like that he or she is gone out of the steemit crypto academy.

Stupid rule created by @sapwood so that he and his friends can get all the reward allocated to this writting campaign @steemitblog

If you check my posts from my introduction post you will find out that i did not use bots in many of them and the post i used them alsways get people attention because they want to see the post i just wrote

You really need to remove that rule so that more newcomer will have reason to invest steem by buying steem and powering up so as to keep the steemit network engaging and tasky not just boring and it is now like connection thing meaning if you this person or this person it is just fishy