— SteemCN

Hi, thanks for the reply.

As I am currently using plagiarism check to check the uniques but I don't have AI tool, can you guide me in that regard so that I can check for AI also.

For now, I'll be using 2 or more of the links that are listed here with random/arbitrary subsections from the posts. The technology is changing rapidly, so I guess that might change frequently as tools change. We'll see. I also still have to get a feel for how to interpret the results. At this point I don't know them well enough to recommend any particular one for you.

One last question why we are not appling for booming support.

There are a few reasons. I think these are the main ones:

First, I think that our first priority should be on creating content that people want to read. If we build an organic/authentic audience, then I believe that the rewards will follow. If we develop a reputation for producing informative, relevant, and authentic content that people want to read, then the audience will arrive.
Second, booming support would attract inauthentic content from people who are chasing rewards before audience, which I believe would detract from the audience-building goal. You mentioned once that you're limited in time because of your day job. I'm the same. As a moderator, I don't have time to be wading through large volumes of posts from people who would rather chase rewards than build an audience.
Third, I don't think we qualify. As I understand, we'd need to have multiple (active) moderators, and a curation account. At present, we don't have either of those, as my co-moderators life situations have made it challenging for them to be here frequently.
Fourth, I prefer for us to maintain our independence as a community. Steemit has been very generous in supporting some of our members - and I definitely hope that continues, but I think (hope) that is simply a result of the broad relevance of the STEM content that we have produced.

In short, successful bloggers on other platforms succeed by putting their time and effort into building their audience by producing and promoting content that people actually want to read. I think we can do that here, too - especially if we all pitch in and do it together as a community.

Second, booming support would attract inauthentic content from people chasing rewards before audience, which I think would detract from the goal of audience building.

There are many users who are dedicated to seeking rewards instead of quality, they just copy and paste until they are detected as plagiarists, but in reality these are not main accounts for this reason they do not mind committing plagiarism. And I agree with your points for the moments the community does not meet the requirements to opt for a booming support. If you start to check the publications, most of the images are taken from google. At least the cover of the post has to be authentic, it could be designed on canva the rest is up to the curators if you meet the requirements.

RE: Weekly update on audience-building for the [Popular STEM] community - March 5, 2023

You are viewing a single comment's thread from: