It is a very curious assumption that was made in 2007 about the extrapolation of the paradox, it is partly logical, but of course we also have to take into account, if we who are part of the universe can count as an observation of the universe, the observer can observe itself, can the cat determine its own state and we return to the snake that bites its tail, we have free will.
By being part of the universe and we really observe it, we can determine what is happening or since we are part of the universe, our observation has no relevance to the universe as a whole, there will be no other civilizations observing the universe first than us and therefore that observation would not have collapsed. and determined that process. But the point is that since we are part of the universe, it does not have logic, we cannot observe, we would have to be outside the universe to be able to apply that theory.
The thing about “Schrödinger's cat” criticized the interpretation of Copenhagen and debated with Einstein on these issues and gave the example of the cat because he considered that it was impossible, that something was wrong here, that is why it was the paradox because a paradox presents us with something that can be contradictory and tells us that something is wrong, that something is wrong here and that it has to have another type of explanation.
Thank you for visiting my blog. If you like posts about
#science,
#planet,
#politics,
#rights #crypto,
#traveling and discovering secrets and beauties of the
#universe, feel free to Follow me as these are the topics I write about the most. Have a wonderful day and stay on this great platform :) :)
! The truth will set us free and science is the one that is closest to the truth!
