I suppose that everyone has seen many science fiction films that depict artificial intelligence during the last century and the beginning of the twenty-first century. Artificial intelligence awakens to attain human consciousness in these films, and subsequently either resists or conquer humans. kismet The rapid growth of computers at the time would unavoidably lead to the emergence of artificial intelligence consciousness.
However, this type of assumption is still prevalent in science fiction films, and some scientists have recently expressed their concerns that computers will never attain human consciousness.
Artificial intelligence ( AI ), often known as deep learning technology, is a technology idea that has gained popularity in recent years. Many technology corporations, like Microsoft, Google, Huawei, Tencent, and others, have their own artificial intelligence research.
Some scholars continue to argue that using computers to replicate neuroscience is the only way to obtain computer consciousness, but we believe that these efforts will fail, and that consciousness cannot be produced by computations. The human brain integrates numerous types of information, such as sight and smell, that computers cannot yet perceive, analyse, or store.
Many people mistakenly think of the human brain as a machine. This isn't true. The human brain does not work in the same way that a computer does.
By responding to neuronal connections in the activity between the item and the environment, the human brain saves experience in the brain. Computers, on the other hand, store data in short- and long-term storage units, which implies that the brain processes information in a completely different way than a calculator.
The brain actively examines the world in search of one or more actionable items. People will view a table differently from different perspectives, for example, but humans will not calculate physical information such as the table's size. Rather, it recognizes the table as a result of subliminal memory.
These methods of identification are not the same as those used in computers.
Furthermore, a conscious person will be aware of what they are thinking and will be able to switch their focus from one item to another, regardless of where they are thinking. Computers, on the other hand, have a terrible time with this. Alan Turing argued more than eighty years ago that there is no way to prove that any particular computer programme can stop on its own, but that this ability is necessary for awareness.
His reasoning is founded on a logical fallacy: pretend that there is a generic mechanism that can predict if the analysed method will stop. The process' output will be either "Yes, it will stop" or "No, it will not stop." That's all there is to it. Turing then imagined that a clever engineer had created a software that featured the ability to halt the inspection process. The program featured a vital feature: if the person who stopped the inspector said "yes," the program would stop. Otherwise, the instructions would continue to execute.
Running the stop check process on this new program will very certainly result in a stop checker error: if the program is determined to stop, the program's description will tell it not to. If the stop checker concludes that the program will not stop, the program's instructions will immediately terminate all operations. That is incomprehensible.
As a result, Turing concludes that there is no way to examine the program and that it can be stopped with certainty. As a result, it is difficult to know whether or not any computer can imitate a system, and whether or not that system can certainly stop thinking and transition into another thinking—but the certainty of this function is an intrinsic component of consciousness.
Medical study shows that there is no particular structure in the human brain that processes consciousness, confirming these theories. Distinct cognitive tasks occur in different areas of the brain, according to functional MRI imaging. This unlimited brain capacity is too much for a finite machine to handle.