I must start off this blog with a warning that this is some really messed up shit. And nothing is what it appears on the surface. The MSmockingbirdM has made sure we do not talk about the real issues.
"SanFran is fine. This inflation is transitory. The police are racist"
So, where to start untangling this mess?
What are the real core issues?
How do we avoid the gulags FEMA camps?
Are the po-po rashish?
Well, if you look at percentage of blacks in prisons, then you might think so.
But if you look at the percentage of Chinese, or other races you find what might be anti-racism.
However, if you look at the population in prisons by who was raised by a single mother, you find that race disappears. What we have is a problem of fathers not being a part of the child's life. Especially around the age of five.
So, we really do not have a problem of racism, we have a group of people who didn't have a father to teach them how to delay gratification and learn how to earn things they want.
The problem is this is almost impossible to cure. In the psychiatrists office you have to work on so many issues like anti-social behavior, anger management, etc... before you get down to the real issue, abandonment.
Is the lack of po-po causing crime to escalate?
If you look at San Fran or Portland you might say yes.
But there was another city that got rid of their entire police department and crime went down.
And one must ask, is crime actually deterred by jack-booted thugs?
Crime seems lowest in a community where there aren't too many destitute people, and the people of the community feel that they can get what they want by getting a job. In these places there are few criminals and very few homeless.
It also seems essential that the buildings look maintained. The paint not so faded. No broken windows.
(yes, it has been analyzed and the results are that a city cannot afford a broken window)
It really appears that a police presence is actually not much of a deterrent to criminals.
And if you actually watch police. Most are not actually patrolling the neighborhood. They are out writing speeding tickets. So, any criminals just learn when the police are not about and then they commit the crime they already staked out.
On the other hand the thing that really deters crime is a place where most people have guns and the law allows them to defend their homes.
Po Po, Just the largest gang
People who have really dealt with the police more than just traffic stops and such, all say that they are a gang, and you must treat them as a gang. The largest, most heavily armed gang.
They protect their own first. Then they follows the edicts of the courts, which are of the banks.
They are not under any obligation to protect the people. (as seen in a few recent court cases)
Further, the cops all get magazine on how to be better cops. ALL of these magazines are about how to deal with the public. How to stay in charge in a situation. How the public is your enemy. You let your guard down you die.
What happens here is you get a police force that is separated more and more from the populous.
It really is us vs them.
And when psychopaths / narcissists get on the force they aren't called out and removed. The "good cop" who calls them out may succeed in getting them kicked off the force, but they will receive huge backlash. Be ostracized by their fellow police. Rule #1 is that you do not endanger the gang. (even if these bad cops get kicked out, the Federal EndTable of Intimidation will hire them. Yes, they love this type there)
The thing that would help most with crime is getting rid of the Fed.
The central banks, set up with fractional reserve lending always makes the slowest in the population destitute and unable to ever get ahead. The slowest gets crushed, ground up.
But we are talking about the po po.
If we are to have them, then they need to be firmly under the people paying for them to be there. (and we have to make sure that is not the banks) Getting rid of a cop should be a simple election, or enough signatures of the people who pay for the police. It should not be many levels of hearings and people from the inside evaluating themselves to see if they broke any laws.
Then, we never come to a time when you have to ask Larken Rose's question, "When should you shoot a cop". Because we just fire them all.
They are never let to be in a place where they can round up the people and send them to the FEMA camps. That would be rounding up all their employers, meaning they would be instantly unemployed.
We need to stomp out fatherless homes.
We need to bring the police under direct control from the community.
And the police need to be part of the community.