Source:
There doesn't seem to be an active discussion of equality as of now. Discussions between individuals lead to discussions between groups, and moreover, to social public debates.
As a person living with a disability, I am also in a position to call for equality, so this is true. If the injustices that have been suppressed over the past few years are exposed to the world and society, and opinions can be expressed actively in the future as they are now, it seems that there is nothing more to hope for. However, in this lively communication, there may be opinions that differ from mine, but if I can relax a little, it will be an added bonus.
As I said before, I am also a person who calls for equality every day. It seems that the aspect of true equality that such people think about being in the realm of darkness that most people don't find is not enough, and writing something in opaque ink that doesn't linger in the minds of many, can be said at once. in two ways.
Source:
The first is not to lose essence.
The essence here is literally human essence. That is, I hope that the essence of all human beings should be respected, except for nobles whose form is determined according to the currents and directions of the times.
The second is together without prejudice.
Whether a person's gender is male or female, I think equality will be achieved if we can be together regardless of whether we have disabilities, whether we have diseases, or whether we are young or old. But despite this idea, equality is still a long way off, and it often sounds like a floating story. Furthermore, these thoughts may feel meaningless.
Source:
No matter how good an opinion is, it should not be ignored that people may have a different opinion.
But these days, paradoxically, it seems hard to admit the difference. Obviously, bringing sensitive issues to the fore is more active than ever, but when an opinion is raised on an issue that is supported by many people, the person expressing that opinion is flooded with concentration and boredom.
Discussions on safety measures, gender equality issues, and solutions for the well-being of people with disabilities and the elderly. When disputes arise about issues that require serious and in-depth discussion, they are unable to express their beliefs. It wasn't wrong, it was something else, and it was rejected. It's true that they fight each other because of their beliefs, but it's not right to just stand by and criticize them unconditionally. Both parties have their reasons.
Although he himself agrees with the abolition of the disability ranking system, its immediate abolition without long-term action is a matter of great concern, as even fellow persons with disabilities receive harsh criticism.
The main point is that it should be done taking into account the individual situation, rather than determining the level of care all at once by rating. Decisions should not be made hastily without discussing financial sources or appropriate methodology for elimination.
Source:
The problem is that this kind of discussion doesn't happen. Then there are many cases where you ask yourself, are you okay with this? I think the other problem is the same. I think it might be too late to come up with a counter-argument after fully listening to the opinions of those against a particular issue. Of course, filtering the words of those who oppose for the sake of opposition without such a mindset too…
someone does it The reason why they have two ears is because God created them to listen carefully to the opinions of both sides.
Here I want to add one more. As you can see, he has two lips. upper lip and lower lip.
To speak, you must separate the two overlapping lips. This is a fleeting moment, but isn't it the Creator's consideration to show generosity to many by thinking and speaking at the time?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit