intends to fulfil a requirement within the computing community by publishing research surveys and expository overviews in computing and related fields. The reviews are aimed toward a general computing audience seeking a full and expert overview of the newest in computing research.
The journal will publish research surveys and expository overviews in computing . Articles from other fields are welcome, as long as their content has relevancy to computing .
Articles should be of sufficient scientific interest and help to advance the elemental understanding of ongoing research, applied or theoretical, for a general computing audience. The treatment of every topic should be quite a listing of known results. Emphasis should get on clarity and originality of presentation and every survey should add insight to the subject under review.
A survey may typically contain the subsequent elements:
Introduction (including motivation and historical remarks)
Outline of the Survey
Basic concepts, examples and results (with sketches of the proofs)
Comments on the relevance of the results, relations to other results and applications
Open problems
Critical review of the relevant literature
Comprehensive bibliography
Authors should provides a clear and well-balanced treatment of their subject. Expanded versions of primary research papers are generally not acceptable. The optimal length for a paper is taken into account to be approximately 30 printed pages or about 20,000 words, including tables and diagrams.
This content appears to be plagiarised from -
https://www.elsevier.com/journals/computer-science-review/1574-0137?generatepdf=true
If you have not already done so, you should head to the newcomers community and complete the newcomer achievement programme. Not only will you earn money through upvotes, you will learn about content etiquette;
You are currently in Stage 1 of our 4 Stage Process:
👉 Stage 1 - 1st Warning - Pointing offenders towards Achievement 3 and highlighting this process. All plagiarised posts currently pending rewards will be flagged and downvoted to $0 rewards.
Stage 2 - A Final Warning - Another request to stop and that plagiarism will not be tolerated. Downvotes amounting to 20% of total pending rewards according to steemworld.
Stage 3 - A stronger message - Downvotes amounting to 50% of pending rewards.
Stage 4 - The strongest message possible - Downvotes amounting to 100% of pending rewards.
Notification to community administrators and moderators:
@fendit ADMIN Writing & Reviews Team
@belenguerra ADMIN Writing & Reviews Team
@writingnreviews MOD Writing & Reviews Team
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit