Baerbock's new Russia plan will result in an endless crisis!

The war in Eastern Europe has been raging since February, and at the beginning of this conflict, as always, there have been those nasty politically incorrect critics, the pacifists, i.e., those who contradict the state narrative and are therefore "officially" bad people from the point of view of the war-mongering mainstream, who have said, "We shouldn't fuel this conflict any further, and we are complicit in a great deal of suffering if we unnecessarily prolong the war, whose outcome has long been determined, by supplying weapons!"

Many Germans stood unfortunately for a long time behind this policy, but now in these days this condition changes! At least in retrospect, most people are always smarter, the same applies to the health policy of the last two and a half years and the long-lasting approval from broad sections of the population, which is slowly but surely reversing and even turning more and more vaccinated people into skeptics, partly even to vaccination opponents due to the experiences they themselves or their relatives have made with the emergency-approved vaccines (keyword: vaccine damage).

It is interesting when suddenly no one wants to have known anything and everyone has always been very critical. Already at the beginning of this spring, we critics have said that the effects of a sanctions policy and an arms supply policy will have serious consequences for Europe, because peace for Europe has historically always been possible only with Russia, but never without Russia! Economically, too, one should not forget this is a rather large and, above all, resource-rich country whose population is not for nothing for the most part loyal behind its president.

In Germany, more and more people have understood this, as a recent poll shows, according to which 77% of respondents are FOR negotiations and for European leaders to continue to maintain contact with Putin. People have understood the peace process cannot produce results without Russia, but only with Russia, and that one should return to the negotiating table instead of continuing this self-destructive policy, which harms Europe more than Russia.

How do the German representatives, who have turned out to be the biggest supporters of this foreign policy, now react to this change of mood among large parts of their people? Not only are they going ahead with it, but they want to see it through in the long term. There is to be an entire realignment in Russia policy. This means nothing other than even if the conflict were to come to an end, a policy hostile to Russia is to be continued at all costs, regardless of how problematic this state of affairs becomes for Europe in the long term.

One passage of this four-point plan of the German government is quite interesting, which is why one should take a close look at it. Among other things, it calls for the "strengthening of Germany's own defensibility", "support for Russian opponents of the regime", "support for the country with which there is currently a conflict" and the "defense of international law", with which this government traditionally does not seem to take it very seriously with some of its allies (USA), which, for example, used disinformation such as "The Nayirah testimony" to launch a war of aggression against Iraq. For example, they used disinformation such as "The Nayirah testimony" to justify a war of aggression against a country (Iraq) that was not supported with weapons by a rather hypocritical EU, so that it could defend itself against the aggressors.

What is very interesting in the aforementioned four-point plan is the support of opponents of the regime. The U.S. foreign policy is already known for very similar practices, in which very targeted support was given to people who were critical of the system, which in itself is nothing bad in a democracy, in which different opinions - unlike in dictatorships - may be expressed freely. The consequences of such a policy, however, this artificially induced destabilization of a state from outside, can be seen today in many countries of the Middle East, where one sees chaos, poverty and very often civil wars.

It is always very dangerous when European or Western nations in general try to interfere subliminally in other countries and deliberately destabilize systems there through outside intervention. For this reason, one has to take a close look at this passage of the said four-point plan, which is about supporting opponents of the regime, because first of all, it does not correspond to the will of the people to do something like that, because no citizen wants this conflict to be dragged on economically and militarily, and secondly, destabilizing such large nations always means that it will also have major negative geopolitical repercussions.

What is of course also mentioned in this plan is financial support of the country with which Russia is currently engaged in a conflict will continue to flow and that it also has its price, a price that can become even higher in future and "which will probably increase again", so literally. This means the whole thing is now designed for the long term, and even if this local conflict should come to an end, this does not mean Western policy will again take a step towards the other side, but instead, in order to serve certain interests, a division is to be brought about in the long term, which would never even have been conceivable without the double standards of the West, which are known worldwide and have been tolerated for too long from the world.

I do not believe this is in the interest of the European economy and peace policy, but I have not given up hope of a turnaround in view of many citizens who no longer want to play this game, if only for selfish reasons, because they themselves have already felt the economic consequences of this madness.