It's Irrelevant. My point is about the Renaissance period. The british only ever got to India because we had a brief 70 year period under the Spanish Phillipine dinasty and those fuckers managed to get all the boats sunk. Portugal was the only power in the Indian Ocean for well over 100 years and even then, we left India later than the Brits and Macao later than they left Hong Kong. Also, we never cared for land domination. We only ever phocused on holding on to strategic ports, as our point was to dominate trade routes, not to invade the Indian sub-continent. The British East India adventure, also, enjoyed from great help from using our ports as way stations, because we were allies with the English and any military clashes we had with Englishmen were mostly around the Caribbean and the North of Brasil and they were Pirates and Privateer, not ships flying the English flag.
As I said. The story needs to be told. Also, there are lots of Hollywood lies and historical distortion in all that pertains to that era.
The Britisth didn't simply arrive in India. Portugal and England are Allies since the Magna Carta and Spain was threatening to take charge of our overseas prossessions.
You did not read what I wrote.
RE: Escreva-se a história do homem comum na era dos Descobrimentos (PT)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Escreva-se a história do homem comum na era dos Descobrimentos (PT)
Of course I read what you wrote; I think you know that too ;-)) I got a bit of hot patriotism from your text, which is understandable in view of the many inadequate representations and distortions that you rightly deplore. You make a conscious distinction between influence on land and in the area of the coasts and coastal seas. If you consider the former, England played the more formative role, and I say that as a non-friend of all colonisation. As far as harbours and sea routes are concerned, Portugal was probably the pioneer and placeholder - but not alone in the field. The English were there, the Italians (okay, historically correct probably the Venetians, but not the Genoese...) and the Chinese were an active seafaring nation in the Bay of Bengal... I'm not denying that your country had an outstanding presence there! I am relativising influencing factors...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Obviously, all stories are relative, still, this is only one of them and, the undeniable fact is Portugal was the first global village. Allow me to publish a few more texts in this line and you will see that I don't deny the participation of others. History belongs to all of us.
Plus: I have no national fervor. I am European, in every sense. What I strive for is the presevation of our common culture, and the portuguese enterprise of exploration of the world is an important part of it, as were the histories of all european countries. Remember that Portugal was founded by a Borgougnoise and at some point, both The Netherlands, most of Germany, Sicily, Spain and Portugal were under the same King, and this wasn't the Roman Empire, it was in the same 17th Century that the English formed the East India Company. :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Highly welcome! ;-))
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit