COVID-19 Tests Don't Actually Test for COVID-19?
5 years ago by krnel (78)
$15.82
- Past Payouts $15.82
- - Author $8.14
- - Curators $7.68
233 votes
- + v4vapid: $4.338 (100%)
- + tribesteemup: $3.969 (35%)
- + justyy: $2.153 (29%)
- + gunthertopp: $1.647 (100%)
- + krnel: $0.692 (100%)
- + diggndeeper.com: $0.615 (100%)
- + tarazkp: $0.460 (100%)
- + edicted: $0.305 (100%)
- + ctime: $0.185 (6%)
- + lemooljiang: $0.144 (59%)
- + payroll: $0.094 (4%)
- + abh12345: $0.083 (20%)
- + minerthreat: $0.081 (100%)
- + sbi3: $0.077 (91.93%)
- + selce-n: $0.077 (100%)
- + jang: $0.074 (100%)
- + mmmmkkkk311: $0.073 (100%)
- + meno: $0.058 (25%)
- + stevescoins: $0.038 (75%)
- + jasonbu: $0.037 (38%)
- … and 213 more
@krnel, Thanks for this, it is a meaningful chunk of information for what is going on "Right Now". Couple of things to consider when it comes to the CDC and the FDA, (1) the CDC is the worlds largest holder of medicinal patents and (2) they are NOT a part of the US gov't.
A viable test for a "New" virus takes anywhere from 3 to 7 months to develop and can take up to a year to develop a viable vaccine for that virus. remember, the have to incubate and grow a BUNCH of the virus in order for it to die then the proteins can be used to develop the specific vaccine.
For the inner workings of the CDC you need look no further than the way they handle "Flu Shots" every year. The CDC acknowledges that they do a "best guess" when it comes to a "Seasonal flu shot" because they DO NOT have a viable sample, yet, so you have about a 10% chance of getting a shot that is close enough to do any good and only about 18% of the recipients actually get any benefit from the shot.
So, accurate test now? that would be "NO", FDA releasing a vaccine for testing, that would be "only in your dreams" from our government.
Mitch,
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, there are lots of smoke and mirrors that they are passing off the rest of us as concrete reality. Big deception on many levels.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Here is what you would have to do to test for COVID-19
Take the sample,
kill everything,
separate out the DNA and RNA,
recombine and lengthen them,
put them through a DNA analyzer (one type uses a laser to burn each micro drop that is squeezed out of a tiny tube, and the reflected light from each burned piece gives you a letter code... sorta)
And then compare that DNA signature with that of COVID-19.
It just ain't happening.
So, most tests for viruses test for a lack of some chemical (what the virus ate) or the excess of some chemical (what the virus shat out)
And both of these are really poor, as there are millions of ways to get a false positive.
And false negatives can easily be gotten just by swabbing the wrong area.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah it seems this is supposed to take a while, yet they "have" the test quickly.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So you got this from an anonymous Facebook post, very enlightening.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I just thought on 5G. Nice that you have the same thoughts. Resteemed
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Anyone know the answer to this?
how did they find COVID-19 on the test kits?!?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/03/30/uks-attempt-ramp-coronavirus-testing-hindered-key-components/
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit