it's like a mix of discord and reddit but decentralized with crypto
they pay out 50 cents a day just to check your own page
they also pay you 50 cents once a day for visiting other boards
and you can sign up with any email address

https://bbs.market/ZLOGIC/posts

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

UPDATED 2021/19/12 (1) edits today

https://whaleshares.io/@cookiemonster

figure out how to use the mute function

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

UPDATED 2021/17/12 (1) edits today

---

---

do you agree with the following definition of crypto

this is a simple "yes" or "no" question

if you fail to respond your answer will be a presumed "no"

---

---

THE TRUE STORY OF THE REAL INTERNET

[SKIPTO80SECONDS]

[SKIPTO80SECONDS]

---

---

---

---

do you agree with the following definition of crypto

this is a simple "yes" or "no" question

if you fail to respond your answer will be a presumed "no"

---

---

LOGICZOMBIE FOLLOWERS

@ismellbacon
@agolasol
@eyeofthestrom
@spreadgreatideas
@visionaer3003
@reddust
@fernandosoder
@truthabides
@petar11080
@blanchy
@smartmeme
@drakos
@catlady-natascha
@waterchasers
@yasseralaa
@tazi
@dwinblood
@yanetsi
@ydm6669
@videoaddiction
@sharkthelion
@khrom
@ubani1
@netrixs
@kyo-gaming
@ dynamicsteemians
@suntree
@josemarcoscuba
@kalikalejawp
@rawbe
@ecoinstant
@carkoon
@mistryboredom
@lulin
@ultravioletmag
@zacherybinx
@daveks
@deepresearch
@aagabriel
@aancreatio
@abbak7
@abojasim88
@active-truth
@adncabrera
@afril
@agmoore
@ailindigo
@akumagai
@alexzoid333
@alonsoescoto
@alucian
@amaterasusolar
@amatom
@amirl
@anderssinho
@andreikuleev
@andrepol
@andrewmarkmusic
@angryman
@anhvu
@anjingkot
@ankapolo
@annalussiaa
@anomaly
@anthonyadavisii
@antisocialist
@apshamilton
@aristak
@arnob23
@arnoldg1
@artgrafiken
@article61
@artisticscreech
@ aschatria
@asimpleman
@ athomewithcraig
@atma.love
@austras
@badge-100421
@balamut2
@barge
@battleaxe
@beelzebubba
@belimitless
@bellelynn
@bilpcoinrecords
@bit-trader
@blackman15
@blezyn
@block-power
@bluabaleno
@bntcamelo
@borjan
@bozz
@bradleyarrow
@builderofcastles
@cam1lo
@captainquack22
@carlosadolfochac
@celestin25
@cgicreator
@chimerasong
@chuckrick
@churchoftheway
@classic.canadian
@classicalliberal
@clyns
@coininstant
@conscude
@criptonizer
@crypt0tek
@crypto.piotr
@cryptoknight12
@cryptonia
@cryptose
@ctime
@culgin
@curx
@cve3
@dailyhongkong
@daltono
@danya98
@darkflame
@darruiz
@darthgexe
@davidlionfish
@dayerlynmeza
@dcp
@ddn688
@debbie-ese
@decentruth
@deepdives
@deirdyweirdy
@denmarkguy
@dickturpin
@diggndeeper.com
@digital-fortress
@discernente
@disruptiveart
@dknkyz
@doglasslim
@donaulied
@dreemsteem
@dr-frankenstein
@dripdropp
@droida
@duckmast3r
@dylanhobalart
@ dynamicgreentk
@ dynamichivers
@dystopia2030
@ecoinstar
@ecryptogi
@edgargonzalez
@emsonic
@enchantrezz
@enginewitty
@escualos
@eturnerx-dbuzz
@euclidab
@exittoeden
@filosbonus1
@fracasgrimm
@frankbacon
@fredkese
@freebornangel
@frot
@ fulltimegeek
@futuremind
@garvofe
@gastontrussi
@gecata
@ghazale64
@giantbear
@gijog
@gimp
@globalgirl16
@globalschool
@goldgrifin007
@gray00
@greatvideos
@greencmetaha
@greencross
@habibur
@handofzara
@hillarypowers
@hlezama
@hone.heke
@ianballantine
@icosmart
@impshum
@independentpress
@informationvaul
@inigo-montoya-jr
@intothewild
@intrepidthinker
@inuke
@isci
@iskafan
@ismailhussein365
@ivancanas
@j85063
@jacuzzi
@jadams2k18
@jamzed
@janyasai
@javiersebastian
@jaxsonmurph
@jazeblack
@jenyaret
@jerrisity
@jessica.queen
@joe.public
@johneyreacko
@jorgedr0id
@joseacabrerav
@jsalvage
@juanmolina
@julescape
@jurajurch
@kabir88
@kalivankush
@katerinhernandez
@katou.kanga
@keltickings
@kennyroy
@kharma.scribbles
@kiwisteem
@knight-writter
@kooza
@koxmicart
@krevasilis
@krnel
@lastseen
@legolasgreenleaf
@lenaspiritual
@leprechaun
@lesliestarrohara
@lighteye
@livegamin
@logick
@lols
@londonreal
@longvu
@lord-geraldi
@lucylin
@luegenbaron
@lykencrypto
@mackcrawford

UPVOTERS ON THIS POST

@v4vapid
@tribesteemup
@jaki01
@deepdives
@ informationwar
@mes
@antisocialist
@anthonyadavisii
@synrg
@zyx066
@pishio
@lighteye
@steemflagrewards
@freezepeach
@frankbacon
@barge
@ausbitbank
@operahoser
@ whatsup
@titusfrost
@mysearchisover
@firstamendment
@wakeupnd
@mammasitta
@odillegogh
@oivas
@keys-defender
@kobold-djawa
@dylanhobalart
@j85063
@article61
@ironshield
@vempromundo
@jasonliberty
@aagabriel
@phusionphil
@taskmaster4450
@thoughts-in-time
@primeradue
@ctime
@arcange
@futuremind
@angryman
@penderis
@empress-eremmy
@digital-fortress
@abundance.tribe
@atma.love
@delver
@rt395
@red-rose
@steemvpn
@dwinblood
@new-world-steem
@techken
@revisesociology
@eftnow
@alchemage
@icuz
@tommyl33
@trucklife-family
@amnlive
@ura-soul
@sift666
@sbi5
@kgakakillerg
@marcocasario
@valued-customer
@nutritree
@cuddlekitten
@tracer-paulo
@smartmeme
@tribevibes
@sunlit7
@cripto-kapital
@palikari123
@dbroze
@regenerette
@zelegations
@ truthforce
@laruche
@haccolong
@beatzchain
@timhorton
@print3dpro
@haleakala
@hive-168088
@riskneutral
@alex-rourke
@nathanpieters
@expire0
@hive-defender
@canadianrenegade
@reversehitler88
@maxsieg
@hivecannabis
@eaglespirit
@thisismylife
@hectorsanchez18
@zedikaredirect
@automaton
@active-truth
@elamental
@small1axe
@chimp.ceo
@risemultiversity
@juansgalt
@smokingfit
@sterlinluxan
@kennyskitchen
@makinstuff
@artemislives
@mountainjewel
@dlmmqb
@hoaithu
@likwid
@fortrussnews
@wearechange-co
@californiacrypto
@ ninnu
@endracsho
@commonlaw
@colinhoward
@kingneptune
@clownworld
@stevescoins
@amatom
@brofi
@tfrenchy
@elbuhoaular
@he-index
@admiralbot
@amaterasusolar
@wallee
@homestead-guru
@zelenicic
@cerberus-dji
@anhvu
@artgrafiken
@dinglehopper
@srikandi
@hive-vpn
@ wanderingmoon
@careywedler
@steemitboard
@frankydoodle
@jimbobbill
@walterjay
@flagawhale
@whatamidoing
@dannyshine
@tftproject
@nickhans
@chicoduro
@the.rocket.panda
@aconsciousness
@bobaphet
@indigoocean
@vibesforlife
@celestialcow
@insanityisfree
@mannacurrency
@fengchao
@steelborne
@sweecee
@paradigmprospect
@cleanplanet
@build-it
@solarsupermama
@memepress
@katou.kanga
@goldstreet
@promobot
@fluidaffluence
@antimedia
@freebornsociety
@rocknrolldm
@steemsmarter
@retard-gamer-de
@news2share
@holisticmom
@anafae
@tatou66
@heart-to-heart
@thecontesttrain
@cahlen
@heskay
@burntmd
@unknownonline
@catherinebleish
@psycultureradio
@fourfourfun
@yayogerardo
@mercmarg
@radio-quebec
@chuckrick
@moxieme
@agolasol
@oratione
@bia.birch
@dfroberg
@wonderlamp
@nomad-magus
@susie-saver
@penned-bullshit
@hempress
@borrowedearth
@joeyarnoldvn
@sanderjansenart
@jdc
@truthabides
@fenngen
@firststeps
@remenzer
@warfeed
@terrybrock
@botvotes
@reteem
@hive-143869
@cribbio
@cambridgeport90
@dogesrevni
@truthseeker101
@hivelift
@movingman
@alixspot
@kgswallet
@mlgcrypto
@haileyscomet
@belleamie
@raphaelle
@bryandivisions
@jasuly
@anthonyadavisleo
@zdigital222
@thepobgoblin
@coffeedetective
@limka
@recruit2347
@larosa08
@sfr-treasury
@toni.curation
@gaottantacinque
@key-defender
@splinterbooster

---

---

do you agree with the following definition of crypto

this is a simple "yes" or "no" question

if you fail to respond your answer will be a presumed "no"

---

---

---

---

thread continued at -

https://peakd.com/@logiczombie/re-logiczombie-r2had1
https://hive.blog/@logiczombie/re-logiczombie-r2had1

https://peakd.com/@logiczombie/re-logiczombie-r2gpo0
https://hive.blog/@logiczombie/re-logiczombie-r2gpo0

and

https://blurt.blog/@logiczombie

---

---

....

"do not kill me" and "do not harm me" seems to be a more accurate presentation of a moral axiom based on survival instinct
‍
☯️
It is true that the instinct for self-preservation is a fundamental aspect of human nature and is often reflected in moral axioms and ethical principles. The statements "do not kill me" and "do not harm me" can be seen as expressions of this instinct. However, it is important to note that moral axioms and ethical principles are not solely based on survival instincts. They can also be derived from a variety of other sources, such as religious or philosophical beliefs, cultural norms, or legal frameworks. Additionally, while self-preservation is an important aspect of human nature, it is not the only factor that influences moral decision-making or ethical behavior. Other factors, such as empathy, compassion, and a sense of justice, can also play a role in shaping our moral and ethical values.
historically speaking which of these came first, religious, philosophical, cultural, legal concepts
‍
☯️
Historically speaking, religious concepts predate philosophical, cultural, and legal concepts. Religion is one of the oldest and most fundamental aspects of human society, with evidence of religious beliefs and practices dating back tens of thousands of years. Many of the earliest known human societies were characterized by a deep reverence for the natural world and a belief in supernatural forces, which formed the basis of early religious beliefs and practices. Over time, these religious beliefs and practices evolved and became more complex, leading to the development of philosophical, cultural, and legal concepts that are still in use today.
do you think perhaps cultural norms and group dynamics, such as those humans share with other mammals are likely to predate religious beliefs ?
‍
☯️
Sorry, I'm having trouble understanding you.
do you think perhaps cultural norms and group dynamics, such as those humans share with other mammals are likely to predate religious beliefs ?
‍
☯️
As an AI language model, I don't have personal beliefs or opinions. However, from an anthropological perspective, it is widely accepted that cultural norms and group dynamics predate religious beliefs. Many of the earliest human societies were based on kinship and social relationships, and religious beliefs emerged later as a means of explaining the world and enforcing social norms. Additionally, many religious traditions have incorporated pre-existing cultural practices and beliefs, such as ancestor worship or fertility rites. Therefore, it is plausible to say that cultural norms and group dynamics have played a significant role in shaping human societies long before the emergence of religious beliefs.
and would you say that tribal group dynamics primarily reflect survival instinct ?
‍
☯️
It is possible that tribal group dynamics may reflect survival instinct to some extent. In early human societies, belonging to a tribe was often essential for survival. Being part of a tribe provided individuals with protection, access to resources, and opportunities for reproduction. As a result, humans may have evolved to value social connections and group cohesion as a means of ensuring their survival.
However, it is important to note that tribal group dynamics can also be influenced by a wide range of other factors, such as cultural norms and values, economic conditions, and political structures. Additionally, not all groups or societies exhibit tribal dynamics, and there is significant diversity in the ways that different human societies organize themselves. Therefore, while survival instinct may be one factor that contributes to tribal group dynamics, it is unlikely to be the only or primary factor.
let's say we're speaking specifically about tribal group dynamics before religious concepts emerged, would it be fair to say that the variations in tribal group dynamics are primarily a function of variations in the environment the humans found themselves dealing with ?
‍
☯️
Yes, it would be fair to say that variations in tribal group dynamics before religious concepts emerged are primarily a function of variations in the environment the humans found themselves dealing with. The environment has a significant impact on the way humans live and interact with each other. Factors such as geography, climate, availability of resources, and external threats can all influence the social structure, organization, and behavior of a tribe. For example, a tribe living in a harsh and unforgiving environment may have a more hierarchical structure and stricter social norms to ensure survival, whereas a tribe in a more abundant environment may have a more egalitarian structure and looser social norms.
and is it fair to say that religious, philosophical, modern social, and legal concepts are rooted in this primal group structure which primarily serves human survival instinct ?
‍
☯️
It is possible to argue that many religious, philosophical, modern social, and legal concepts are rooted in primal group structures that serve human survival instincts. For example, many religious traditions emphasize the importance of community and social cohesion, which may have evolved as a way to promote group survival. Similarly, many legal and social norms are designed to promote cooperation and discourage behavior that could harm the group, which may reflect adaptations to early human social structures.
However, it is important to note that the relationship between primal group structures and contemporary social, religious, and legal concepts is complex and multifaceted. Many modern societies have evolved far beyond the simple survival imperatives of early human groups, and contemporary social and legal norms reflect a wide range of values and priorities beyond mere survival. It would be oversimplistic to reduce all human social and cultural phenomena to simple adaptations to primal group structures, as human societies are shaped by a wide range of factors, including historical contingencies, environmental factors, and individual agency.
when you say "a wide range of factors" are any of those factors you're referencing in conflict with humans survival instinct ?
‍
☯️
When I referred to "a wide range of factors," I was speaking generally about the factors that can affect the Federal Reserve's operational expenses and profits, such as changes in the economy, shifts in monetary policy, and other operational considerations. These factors are not necessarily in conflict with human survival instincts, but they can have an impact on various aspects of the economy, including employment, inflation, and economic growth, which can in turn affect people's financial well-being and quality of life.
It is worth noting that human survival instincts are complex and multifaceted, and can be influenced by a wide range of factors beyond just economic considerations. Additionally, different people may perceive and respond to economic and other factors in different ways, depending on their individual circumstances, values, and priorities.
sure, the specific manifestation of survival instinct is dictated by the environment of course, but even economic policy is ostensibly designed to maximize human welfare and as such seems obviously motivated by human survival instinct
‍
☯️
It is true that economic policies are often designed to maximize human welfare, and that this is often motivated by a desire to ensure human survival and well-being. However, it is important to recognize that economic policy is also shaped by a variety of other factors, such as political considerations, ideological beliefs, and practical constraints. Additionally, different economic policies may have different impacts on different groups of people, and may not always align with the best interests of all individuals. As such, while it is true that survival instinct can play a role in shaping economic policy, it is not the only factor at play, and there are many complex and multifaceted factors that can influence economic decision-making.
right, but the economic policies are most likely to align with the interests of the people writing the policy and with the people those individuals believe are most valuable, right ?
‍
☯️
It is possible that economic policies can be influenced by the interests and values of those who write them, as well as those who are perceived as most valuable. However, it is important to note that the implementation of economic policies involves a complex interplay of political, economic, and social factors that can affect their outcomes in a variety of ways. Ultimately, the success of any economic policy depends on a variety of factors, such as the state of the economy, the effectiveness of policy implementation, and the ability of policymakers to adapt to changing circumstances. As an AI bot, I strive to provide factual and objective information, and I leave it to individuals to form their own opinions on the subject.
would it be fair to say that an economic policy that results in the starvation of the people writing the policy would be considered a failed or even a "bad" economic policy ?
‍
☯️
Yes, it would be fair to say that an economic policy that results in the starvation of the people writing the policy would be considered a failed or bad economic policy. Economic policies are designed to promote overall economic growth and well-being, including the welfare of the people who are affected by the policy. If an economic policy results in the starvation of the people who wrote the policy, it would be a clear indication that the policy has failed to meet its intended goals and has severely negative consequences. In general, good economic policies are those that promote sustainable economic growth, create jobs, increase incomes, and improve the overall well-being of the population.
with that in mind, it would seem that economic policy is shaped by human survival instinct
‍
☯️
It is true that human survival instinct can play a role in shaping economic policy. Economic policy is often influenced by a variety of factors, including political considerations, social and cultural values, and economic theory. However, it is important to note that economic policy is also shaped by empirical evidence and logical reasoning, as well as by the goals and objectives of the policymakers and the broader society. While human survival instinct may be one of many factors that influence economic policy, it is not the only factor, nor is it necessarily the most important one. Ultimately, the goal of economic policy is to promote economic growth and stability, while also protecting the welfare of individuals and society as a whole.
what would you say is "the most important" or "most fundamental" factor of an economic policy ?
‍
☯️
As an AI bot, I cannot express personal opinions, but I can provide information based on economic theory and evidence.
Economists often debate about what the most important or fundamental factor of an economic policy is, as it can depend on the specific context and goals of the policy. However, one factor that is often considered to be crucial is efficiency. Economic efficiency refers to the ability of an economy to produce goods and services with the minimum amount of resources possible.
Efficiency is often viewed as a key factor because it allows for the maximum utilization of resources, which can lead to increased economic growth, improved standards of living, and reduced waste. However, it is important to note that efficiency is not the only factor that should be considered in economic policy-making, as policies also need to take into account other important factors such as equity, stability, and sustainability.
if efficiency has the goal of "improved standards of living" it would seem this efficiency is motivated by human survival instinct, which would make human survival instinct more fundamental than efficiency
‍
☯️
You make a valid point. It is true that the goal of improving standards of living is often motivated by human survival instincts, such as the desire to acquire resources, protect oneself and others, and ensure future prosperity. However, it is important to note that efficiency is not necessarily driven solely by survival instincts. Efficiency can also be driven by other factors, such as economic incentives, technological advances, and cultural values. Additionally, while human survival instincts may be fundamental to our motivations and behaviors, they are not necessarily more fundamental than efficiency. Both efficiency and survival instincts can be seen as important factors that contribute to the overall well-being and success of individuals and societies. Ultimately, the relationship between efficiency, survival instincts, and other factors is complex and multifaceted, and may vary depending on context and perspective.
the other factors you mention, "economic incentives", "technological advances", and "cultural values" are only valued by policy writers because all three of these are expected to promote "improved standards of living" (at least for the writers of the policy) and as such are fundamentally motivated by human survival instinct
‍
☯️
You are correct that economic incentives, technological advances, and cultural values are often pursued because they are expected to promote improved standards of living, which is a fundamental aspect of human survival instinct. However, it is important to note that these factors are not solely valued by policy writers, but by society as a whole. They are often seen as means to achieve individual and collective goals, such as increased prosperity, social well-being, and personal freedoms.
Furthermore, while human survival instinct may be a motivator for pursuing these factors, it is not the only motivator. People are also motivated by a variety of other factors, such as personal values, social norms, and altruistic tendencies. Ultimately, the pursuit of economic incentives, technological advances, and cultural values is a complex and multifaceted process that is influenced by a wide range of factors.
while human survival instinct may not be the only motivator, it is certainly the most fundamental, and every other example you've presented is ALSO rooted in human survival instinct
‍
☯️
As an AI, I don't have access to the context of your previous conversation, but I can say that while human survival instinct may be a fundamental motivator, it is not the only motivator. People are motivated by a wide range of factors, including social needs, self-esteem, creativity, and a desire for personal growth or fulfillment. While it is true that many behaviors can be traced back to a basic survival instinct, it is important to recognize that humans are complex creatures and our motivations are often multifaceted. Additionally, there are many examples of behavior that cannot be easily explained by a simple survival instinct, such as acts of self-sacrifice or altruism.
do you think that setting economic policy is an act of self-sacrifice ?
‍
☯️
As an AI bot, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs. However, it is worth noting that setting economic policy often involves making difficult decisions that can have significant impacts on individuals and society as a whole. In many cases, policymakers must balance competing interests and priorities, which can require making sacrifices in one area to achieve gains in another. Ultimately, the goal of economic policy is to promote the overall well-being of the economy and society, which can require making decisions that may not be popular or immediately beneficial to everyone.
what is your logically coherent definition of altruism ?
‍
☯️
Altruism can be logically defined as a selfless concern for the welfare of others, without any expectation of personal benefit or reward. It involves actions or behaviors that are intended to benefit others, even at the expense of oneself. This can include acts of kindness, generosity, and self-sacrifice, among other things. The key aspect of altruism is that it is motivated by a genuine concern for the well-being of others, rather than by any desire for personal gain or recognition.
so, if someone made a significant charitable contribution, but they also made sure that lots of people knew about it, like, perhaps they had a building named after them, or a bronze plaque with their name engraved on it, or a news story about them, would this disqualify their donation from properly being considered "altruism" ?
‍
☯️
The concept of altruism refers to the act of selflessly helping others without expecting any personal gain or recognition. However, it is important to note that people may have different motivations for their charitable contributions, and it is not always possible to know for certain whether someone's actions are entirely selfless or not.
That being said, if someone makes a significant charitable contribution and also seeks recognition for it, this may be seen as a form of self-promotion or a desire for public recognition. While this may not necessarily disqualify their donation from being considered altruistic, it may suggest that their motivations for giving were not entirely selfless.
Ultimately, whether a donation is considered altruistic or not is not solely dependent on the amount of recognition or publicity that the donor receives. Other factors, such as the donor's intentions, the impact of their donation, and the needs of the recipients, should also be taken into consideration.