Your suggestion resonates with mine π. I believe that such changes are an easy way to take a big step forward in increasing the proportion of quality content on Steem.
RE: What if paid voting services provided truly passive ROI for their clients? Would this be an improvement for the ecosystem?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
What if paid voting services provided truly passive ROI for their clients? Would this be an improvement for the ecosystem?
Ah, right. I had forgotten that post. Very similar. The main new things here would be the use of beneficiary settings, instead of transfers, for distribution and hiding the votes below the top level to (maybe) get the low-quality content out of trending.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I suggest you create such a bid bot π. I think it is not difficult from a programming point of view. Every bot creator has a profit from this. You could direct this profit to create a curation account to support talented authors or simply burn it. Such a bot would be more useful for the blockchain. You could combine this bot with your other ideas, such as fifth (I could have made a mistake with the number) generation bots.
Of course, this takes a lot of time, but it could be an interesting experiment. π
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
π I was actually thinking about that... I don't think I have time, though. At least not for the next 6-12 weeks. I have a different project that I think could be really impactful and I am anxious to start, but I haven't even found time for that.
It's a shame I'm not independently wealthy, 'cause if I were, I could make really good use of a development team with all the ideas that I can't find time to move forward withπ.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit