Not sure, from just a "raw data" perspective, but if done through the lens of vetting the actual teams using SC03-09, it might be useful.... but that sort of defeats the purpose of having it, and it's no longer simple.
That said, with a potential altcoin bull run simmering in the early stages, having some kind of quality control cross reference will be a useful tool, as the "horde" is sure to show up if Steem gets back to $0.50-$1.00 or more.
Edited to add: I'd rather see something like a ratio of upvotes to actual page views as a measure of how many people actually READ a given piece of content.
👍 der Gedanke gefällt mir auch !
VgA
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Unfortunately, I'm not aware of any way to get page views - especially given the possibility for views through multiple front-ends. Your suggestion made me think that I could get payout per feed placement, though (based upon the "feed-reach" number, above). Not as good a payout per view, but maybe a step in the right direction. I might add that metric. Thanks for the feedback!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit