Me:
Has anyone ever mentioned that JavaScript sucks at date manipulations?
ChatGPT:
Yes, you're not alone in thinking that! JavaScript's native Date object has long been criticized for its cumbersome and unintuitive handling of date and time manipulations. Many developers find the API confusing, error-prone, and lacking in functionality compared to what's needed for more complex date operations.
This is why libraries like Moment.js (though now in maintenance mode) became popular—they simplified date manipulations significantly. These days, many developers use date-fns or Luxon, which are more modern, lightweight, and offer a more functional approach to date handling.
JavaScript's native date handling has improved with the introduction of Intl.DateTimeFormat for formatting and the Temporal API, which is still a proposal, aims to provide a more robust solution for date and time manipulation. But until those are widely adopted, many developers still prefer using third-party libraries for anything beyond the most basic date manipulations.
Me:
Instead of this:
const fifteenMinutesAgo = new Date(Date.parse(currentCheckTime) - 15 * 60 * 1000).toISOString();
Could I do this?
new Date(currentCheckTime.parse() - 15 * 60 * 1000).toISOString();
ChatGPT
Unfortunately, you can't use
currentCheckTime.parse()
becauseparse()
is a static method of theDate
object, not a method on date strings. So, the syntax you proposed won't work directly.However, you can still simplify it in this way:
const fifteenMinutesAgo = new Date(Date.parse(currentCheckTime) - 15 * 60 * 1000).toISOString();
The
Date.parse()
method is the correct way to convert an ISO date string (currentCheckTime
) to a timestamp. Here's why the alternative doesn't work:Why It Doesn't Work:
currentCheckTime.parse()
: This doesn't work becausecurrentCheckTime
is just a string, and strings in JavaScript don't have aparse()
method.Date.parse()
is the correct way to parse a date string.Correct Syntax:
const currentCheckTime = new Date().toISOString(); const fifteenMinutesAgo = new Date(Date.parse(currentCheckTime) - 15 * 60 * 1000).toISOString();
This is as concise as you can get using native JavaScript without introducing errors.
Me:
I am registering a formal complaint.
ChatGPT:
Complaint registered! 😄
JavaScript date handling has definitely caused many developers frustration over the years. If you ever want to explore alternatives or need tips on how to make date manipulations less painful, I'm here to help. Meanwhile, I'll file this one under "reasons JavaScript drives developers to coffee (or something stronger)!"
Meanwhile, even if we have to write a treatise in order to calculate a time, at least I'm making some progress with the appearance of the recent activity listing.
I'm completely mesmerized by the AI/ChatGPT revolution that really hasn't taken complete form yet. Quite honestly, the ones that adapt to its enhancements and move forward will be the leaders in their respective fields, while those that refuse to evolve will be complaining about being replaced in the near future.
Photo/video/music generation are sources of debate about originality, but just about everything else is better when AI is injected in the right way. I have a friend who is convinced that I can learn python, 100% online, from GPT. I'm not sure of that but wouldn't be surprised.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Me too, though I think it may have temporarily plateaued in capability, with efforts shifting to cost and power reductions for a while. But that's ok. It will be years before we figure out how to make full use of the things that are already possible.
I agree with this, too. In almost every field, I think the best output comes from a combination of human and machine. Even Billy Joel used AI in a recent video. The question is when to use AI, not whether.
It's definitely possible. Moreover, you can be productive with python (or any language) while learning it. That's what I'm doing with JavaScript. The important skill now is problem-solving, and the language almost doesn't matter. If we can describe the solution clearly in English, the machine will manage the details of the language. This even includes performance optimization.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The possibilities for working with current AI, such as Chat GTP, are getting wilder and wilder.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's literally like having a personal online assistant. I can't begin to imagine how much global productivity must have increased for programmers in the last year or two.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
And the development time is getting faster and faster. When it gets to the point where an AI can write and improve an AI itself, this will multiply once again.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Upvoted. Thank You for sending some of your rewards to @null. It will make Steem stronger.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit