Communities Have Tight Control Over Plagiarism || But who controls the Free Zone ||

Hello I hope you are well. Each community has its way of combating plagiarism and spam content, either by silencing or expelling the user from the community. Most of these accounts that make this type of content are usually bots or multi-accounts of an active user.

Made In Canva

With what intention are these accounts plagiarized? Normally it is to earn easy money without much effort since steemit has always existed, there have been users who come to Steemit with that intention. Many have tried to do this type of crime in the communities to receive a vote in favor. Previously, the communities did not have an advanced system of tools that would easily detect plagiarism since these users are very skilled at modifying keywords.

With the advent of advanced tools, the communities feel empowered to combat plagiarism by delegating responsibility to a group of moderators who are in charge of being aware of the fact that the curator is not going to vote for said content, but there are always one or two publications that the detectors do not detect plagiarism and that is something inevitable.

How plagiarism can be slowed down a bit

I am one of the users who supports the project to combat plagiarism and spam content that is sent daily to the platform, I am also one of those who think that a working group without power cannot combat plagiarism, it is as if Batman were wandering around the street without the Batmobile and Iron Man fighting without his suit with artificial intelligence.

It is true that in the past many projects were financed with the delegation of the old steemit team and many of them abused the trust they would receive to self-vote in their account for comments that reached 50 Steem. But now I think it's different. I believe in a person who can be delegated this type of responsibility because he has shown that he has the necessary confidence to be a team leader.

@rex-sumon is a member of the Indian community and in his two years on the platform he has done a great job together with a group of friends that if I named him the list would be a bit long, he is currently the leader of @steemwatcher if my The information is correct, behind it there is a good consolidated work team and it has the support of the community leader @rme. But I think that this is not enough!!.

@steemwatcher can fight plagiarism and spam in communities by warning their user leaders who are committing this type of crime, but it doesn't have the power to fight farming outside of communities, which is a favorite area for plagiarists and spammer.

Charity fit for a cleaner platform

The Indian community leader has been trying to improve Steemit for a couple of months or more by supporting the project of his own free will without receiving anything in return, doing everything possible to encourage new investors and developers to join Steemit. But to achieve that goal you have to have a platform clean of spam and plagiarism.

I propose @rme and @blacks to create an anti-plagiarism account with enough power to stop the accounts that are farming and delegate all responsibility to @rex-sumon as Steemwatcher leader with the intention of removing the reward that they have already earned without any effort. that said reward affects the daily reward fund and makes the voting power weigh less every day and our publications lose 10% of their value when they expire.

Keeping the users who farm down guarantees economic stability to the steem ecosystem and a lot of liquid Steem will stop leaving the platform. to stop this the price of steem will gradually increase its value because it opens less liquid output from the platform, not to mention that our voting power will increase in value.

In the past, this type of strategy was very successful and I think that this type of project could also be feasible today and I have faith that this time it will be very different.

---

Post writter by @joeljaimes1982