Hello sir,
Thank you very much for sharing such a detailed article about booming votes. I see that there is some bias in getting booming votes and communities selecting users for booming votes. Honestly, there are people who follow the rules.. But I am not talking about them. Some communities do not seem to fully accept the rules given by the steemit team for booming votes. It clearly states that a user can only receive a maximum of two booming votes per week. But if that is the case, how come some users get like 5 votes per week..?
Booming votes have been received mostly by some community admins and those community accounts. Also, a higher percentage of the booming votes have been received by the same users every day.
Also, if we look at the list of contests organized on the platform, about 95% of them are contests that give booming votes for prizes. If the maximum number of booming votes is given in this way, are there booming votes to be given for other quality contents..? I say this system should be changed. There should be no such restrictions for booming votes. Every community should act according to the rules and regulations of the Steemit team. If booming votes are given properly, every user who posts quality content on the platform can give a minimum of two booming votes per week.
Are those receiving booming votes the hosts of contests and the moderators/ADMs of a community?
Can you show/tell which communities?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hello @aneukpineung78,
Thanks for your support.
Yes, and most of the contests that give booming votes as prizes are contests. Those communities and the admins and moderators who received the most booming votes are already mentioned in this post.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thank you for replying. I will have a look.
I assume that a part of the booming votes is given as a payment for being a moderator/ADM?
On the other hand I see "steemians" receiving up to 6 booming votes per month because? Perhaps they are moderators in different communities and this is the reason why some are so eager to be one?
What I don't see is how the Italian community uses their boosting votes. I assume they are the only ones also voting outside their community.
@mikitaly @heriadi @solperez?
🍀♥️
@ wakeupkitty
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@wakeupkitty, thank you for mentioning me.
Regarding the way the Italian community uses its booming votes, we create a weekly report where anyone can see how votes are allocated.
In our community, we vote for members who actively participate, even if they are not Italian or are involved in other communities.
Our goal is to support users who contribute significantly to our community and to the Steemit platform as a whole.
We believe in transparency and fairness in the distribution of booming votes.
For this reason, we limit ourselves to one vote per moderator per week, ensuring that the remaining votes are distributed to community members based on their continued engagement, high quality posts and meaningful contributions.
If you also look at our competitions, you can see that our aim is to redistribute steems to those who participate, and you do not have to be a member of our community, because all Steemit users are welcome, as long as they are honest and do not post spam or plagiarism.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Menarik, menurut sudut pandang saya dukungan booming yang berlebihan kepada satu pengguna itu tidak disengaja oleh administrator komunitas, sebab setiap komunitas mengusulkan dukungan di hari yang sama, jadi komunitas A tidak tahu bahwa komunitas B, C dan D juga mengusulkan dukungan Booming untuk pengguna yang sama pada hari yang sama
Mengenai dukungan booming terhadap Admin/Mod di komunitas kami Steem For Better Life tidak pernah diusulkan untuk Admin, kami hanya memberikan untuk Mod dan akun komunitas maksimal 2 post yang diterbitkan di komunitas
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yes, that's possible. But the steemit team clearly states that the number of booming votes a person can get per week is two. I'm saying that only some communities follow these rules exactly. Looking at the information in this article, anyone would think that.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
If you read the reactions of those mentioned you might have your answer?
See here: https://steemit.com/hive-150122/@heriadi/soy4b4
@heriadi says the communities do not know from another who is nominated for a booming vote. This means that if 1 person is a moderator at 5 communities or frequently writes for different communities s/he can recieve booming votes from each one of them week after week...
If you read this: https://steemit.com/hive-150122/@mikitaly/soydfr
You will also read that these votes go to what is good and those investing in Steemit in the way like @mikitaly explained.
Are there that many good posts? I cannot tell/decide that. I only know I find it very hard to find them same if it comes to good comments. This can be based on a difference of taste or?
If you think thete's something suspicious it might be good to memtion it.
There are not that many communities with these votes and those who have them do not all have the same amount per day. Perhaps it is more interesting to calculate what the percentage is going to "members" and adm/mods?
@wakeupkitty
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit