Yes, I touched on multiple topics because I read all the comments you received. 😁
It's true, you were talking about the inconsistency of some community curators who ask members to join clubs, but they are the first ones who don't care.
It's bad certainly, but it's also bad to make users think they are mandatory when they are not and in fact it's not written anywhere.
Precisely because I feel the same way as @the-gorilla I think it's time to talk more about it.
A few old users had made interesting proposals, such as buying part of steem through SBDs and then finding a way to burn them by taking them out of circulation.
It has to be a mechanism within the platform to provide for burning, it cannot depend on some users deciding to sacrifice a portion of their rewards.
The problem is not to see if it is burned, every steemit wallet can be controlled by everyone, the real problem is to be sure that no one has the keys to the null wallet and that it cannot be hacked.
It's not impossible, by now burning is used by so many platforms, TronDao itself has been practicing burning for a long time, communicating it daily to its followers on X. In short, I believe that a solution other than the current one can be found. 😜
Happy weekend to you too.
Every wallet can be controlled but the wallet @null is empty.
Not one single Steem ever arrived in it. So I do believe it is important to show/explain where the Steem is transferred to. The auto reply received is from an account/Steemian who earned before the hardfork well and changed the name and owns @null or?
If mining can't be stopped the value can go up or we are satisfied with the balue as it is.
Thanks for the burning info.
🍀♥️
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit