I tested the latest invention of @kafio

The Ultimate Analytic Tool

All you have to do is to click the web link - fill out a hashtag and set the period, and hit "search" (mobile users can also download the mobile app which is a PWA (Progressive Web App) and is different from installing a regular app. It doesn't take up much space like the usual apps. It’s a smart technology designed to save space _{information @kafio}

What will be shown?

Everything? No, not as we ran it with #wewrite or #miner-wewrite. Many comments were left out, and the number one of our Miner-Wewrite Winners - Lesson 2 didn't even show in the top 10. We deal here with a problem that could be solved in a different way. A huger problem is that comments with a hashtag cannot be found and, therefore, are not counted._

Underneath, you see screenshots of different tests. I tested the overview with and without comments over a month, two weeks and one week.

_{There are different outcomes between this tool and tools used by other Steemians who generate lists about commenters and so on.}

This tool is promising for:

• Hosts of a contest if all participants use the same hashtag. It would also be helpful if, instead of ten, twelve names were shown.
  I looked around a bit, and for the contest hosted by @solperez this tool cannot be used since participants use different hashtags if they use it at all.
  Next to that, it will be hard to see entries of a contest only if the connection with a community isn't made and one hashtag is used by many others.
  Searching by one hashtag results in being investors and those posting faster than the speed of light with the help of AI as the Top Authors, which is a misleading outcome.
• Everyone who likes to see the results of their own posts,
• Teachers of #learnwithsteem
• Clubmentor
• Moderators
• Steemcurators
  And for everyone counts that they should know how to use it and what exactly is calculated if it comes to "Top author", comments and club status.
  
  

The tool is helpful if it shows:

• real comments (no thanks, okay and greetings)
• engagement (replies)
• (steem)curators among the commenters although they only leave a picture behind.
  It will be interesting to see if curating teams care about a certain contest, community or hashtag.
  
  
  
  

Is the outcome reliable

I ran the web version, searched for certain hashtags and checked the results.
I tried the hashtag #artonsteemit #art #creative #story and a few other very common ones with the idea that it might be helpful for steemcurator to see a few new names to have a look at, but this is a dead end. What is shown are the high-ranked, many boring posts, copy-pasted posts/contests, and AI-generated text, which do not really add something to Steemit, are worth the visit because these investors are using upvotebots, which the average steemcurator will not vote for.
So, the hidden gems? I am afraid it will be the old-fashioned handwork combined with the human brain and commenting yourself which is the best way if you like to find them.

It didn't take too long for the results to show. It is possible to download the tables with an easy click.

Conclusion

This tool is handy and easy to use, and to those with brains the results can be used in different ways. What is missing are extra options like: hashtag x community and author x comments (where all comments are calculated) or perhaps even a third search option like: community x author x comment/post.

I noticed that the results of the search is not the same as what I (we) calculated if it comes to #miner-wewrite and #artonsteemit.

Therefore, the outcome of the info given is not accurate and could not be used by us.

• The best commenters don't show and are not even in the top 10.
• It is it hard to believe that over 1 month time no steemcurator showed in the search #artonsteemit (they did as @abdullahw2 ran a test).
• There are people mentioned as top authors who never posted a single post (they only comment), and some did not even comment.
  
  

The problems mentioned can be solved, and therefore, this tool deserves to be further developed.

I would use it since it gives plenty of information, is easy to run on a phone, and the tables shown are very helpful, and it's great to see the number of posts written by those participating in MWW without investing hours of searching and counting in the future.

It is worth the try

Note: all mentioned issues were solved. An uodate is planned but it may be clear that time and data isn't free and unlimited.

_{@mikitaly @joslud @talkit}