Identity-Based Signcryption and Its Mode of Operation on the Blockchain Network

Source

INTRODUCTION

Identity-Based Signcryption (IBSC) is a novel technique, through which encryption and signatures are carried out in one step only. Its characteristic makes it more useful for the blockchain networks in that it increases security in the due minimal computational costs. Rather than traditional certificate-based infrastructures, IBSC takes the recipient's identity information such as (email address, blockchain address) as the public key. As a result, there is no need to deal with the issuance of public key certificates.

For the blockchain networks, speed and security measures in performing transactions are of paramount importance. The IBSC guarantees that secure and authenticated communication is achieved without lots of complexities as confidentiality and verification are executed through one cryptographic process. This makes it to be very beneficial in the cases where quick, secure and low latency transaction solutions are required such as smart contracts, dApps and secure messaging.

Furthermore, the employment of identity-based cryptography erases the headache of key management issues. Users, in such cases, have to depend on certificate authorities (CA) to issue and circulate the keys. Instead of that, in case of IBSC, dependence on CA is minimized, which is much more productive and appropriately suited towards the ethos of the blockchain technology.

• USER IDENTITY AS PUBLIC KEY

The first stage of IBSC consists of treating the identity information of the recipient as their public key. As an emphasis on traditional cryptographic systems, there is a need for a user to create a public-private key pair along with a certificate issued by a trusted party. However, this is no longer appropriate with IBSC since the public key is not created separately from the user’s identity.

In such type of network, identity could be in the form of the address of the wallet, or any arbitrary string specified by the user. The sender places the encryption of the message together with the signature using the public key of the recipient based on identity. This hence enables the sender to carry out the transaction without the need of exchanging any keys beforehand.

The strategy is a quick and efficient way of enhancing communication on the blockchain while drastically reducing processing time. Because the public key is created according to an identity of a particular individual, the method is readily suitable within the context of the pseudonymity of the blockchain architecture.

• SIGNCRYPTION PROCESS FOR TRANSACTION INTEGRITY

In the signcryption process, the sender has to both encrypt and sign at the same time. This dual-action secures the document in that it is made available in an encrypted format while at the same time authentication of the sender is done, thereby making the transaction to be complete. In this situation the sender signs the message with using his private key and then the message is encrypted with recipient’s identity based public key.

This practice protects the information so that the message can only be opened by the particular party to whom it has been addressed. At the same time, it asserts proof of origin with the use of a signature from the originating party. Within the blockchain network, this feature is most applicable where smart contracts and private transactions are involved.

Source

The combined signing and encryption operations in the case of IBSC eliminates the operational costs and usage of power. Also, the nodes on the blockchain are capable of verifying transactions within a relatively short period of time, thus enhancing the efficiency of the network.

• DECRYPTION AND VERIFICATION BY RECIPIENT

When the transaction is completed at the receiver’s end, he or she uses her or his private key, which is equivalent to the identity-based public key, to decrypt the message. Once decrypted, the receiver is able to confirm the actual sender’s identity through an embedded signature. This helps to assure non-repudiation of the message: that is, it helps to prove that the message is secure as well as the person who sent it.

This is a critical part of the mature blockchain systems, where the recipient has to be able to trust, or not in a certain amount of the risk, the received information. Both the sender’s identity and the data itself can be verified by the recipient, and in this way protecting the network from forgery and other possible cases of data truncation affects. This is of more importance when the meto interface participants are engaging in interaction in a pseudonymous manner.

In the IBSC system, the recipient is able to decode the message without the need of calling upon certificate authorities or any third-party verifiers. This limits the occurrence of centralized points of failure and increases safety in the non-centralized networks.

• REDUCTION OF KEY MANAGEMENT OVERHEAD

A key benefit of IBSC is that it reduces the complexity of such key management where there are no foundations of key management infrastructure. While employing conventional guarantees to data security, its users are expected to manage, store, and control private and public keys as well as certificates issued by trusted authorities. This is particularly important for blockchain networks pushing for decentralization as the identity-based system of IBSC reduces the KDC burdens.

The constraints brought about by the reliance on a certificate infrastructure have in a way restricted the scope of blockchain possibilities and contributed to complexity in blockchain applications. Post and Key Revocation Information Assurance: Users do not care about the issues regarding key expiry and all other processes on key revocation. Thus the system has an added advantage securitywise.

Such is the affinity of IBSC with the new developments in them that it does not compromise on the fundamental principles of management of upper layer agents. Therefore, restoring such confidence leads to centrally controlled distributed networks fighting requests to block excessive downside transactions.

CONCLUSION

Source

Integrating IBSC in the current systems strengthens their security and effectiveness while promoting the concept of network decentralization. Since the public key denotes the user’s identity, key management becomes easy in IBSC, key revocation cross and computational cost is less. In the context of the blockchain network, it provides the above system for the trust and the purchasing power of TMS transactions.