Learn With Me #2: The Origin of Life-Evolution or Creation?

in hive-167213 •  2 months ago  (edited)

I have been reading a book this past week and it has corrected things I previously thought.

The Origin of Life has always been a question on whether it is Evolution-based or Creation-based. Personally, I have always decided it is creation based. I believe in God, an intelligent designer. I also understand that a lot of people believe differently. They believe in the process of evolution, where an animal mutates from one animal to another. They believe that human beings evolved from the ape-man. I have always regarded this as merely an opposition to religion but I never realised just how poor their investigations have been. In fact, the scientists solution to the origin of creation is regarded by many scientists themselves as Science Fiction.

1000913920.jpg

Science follows a method which is used to develop and test the scientific knowledge and accept is as true or false. Roughly,.it follows observation, hypothesis, experimentation, and data analysis. The investigation of whether human beings are descendent from ape-men, I soon discovered, are extremely poor. And by the scientific method, should not be regarded as a true theory but rather, science fiction. The author puts in many sources of investigations, that supports the disagreement on the theory. There are no fossil records (fossil records are necessary to draw links to ancestors) and no present circumstance to support the ape-man ancestry or that they ever existed.

What baffles me, however, is that people still run around with this theory. There is a running joke where people refer to Charles Darwin as their God. Why do people still advocate for this theory when it has been tagged presumptuous by investigative scientists themselves? Dogmatism. And this dogmatism is represented by certain scientists in the evolutionary field as well. These certain scientists cannot chest the thought of a non-scientific reason, going as far as overriding their scientific method and jumping to whatever conclusions they can find to prove their is no intelligent design.

1000913953.jpg

Fossil records of mutation are non-existent. Neither does anything like that currently exist.

Scientific investigation, has also proven that nothing happened randomly or by chance. The genetic code, amazing photosynthesis, the incredible cell, the brain, are way too complex for it to be by chance. After many experimentations, scientists couldn't even come close to creating what happened by 'chance'.

I just found out, though I never accepted it, the theory of creation by evolution is not an accepted theory, not even close! I wish people would stop defending baseless opinions on evolution and start reading more into it. It's good to know what you stand for. The theory of creation by evolution is still ongoing.

@monoxhrome @alexanderpeace @m-fdo

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Thank you very much for publishing your post in Teachers and Students community

DescriptionInformation
Verified User
Plagiarism Free / AI Article Free
#steemexclusive
350+ Words
#club5050
Bot Free

Beneficiaries

* #burnsteem25
* @ myteacher

No
No
  • I once heard a saying that goes, as smart as a squirrel jumps, it will fall too. So too with the long-spread theory of lies, in the end the truth will always come to the surface.

  • do more power ups and join club5050.