Not that many people would read this and change their mind, but I'm not sure the soft fork being deployed on the STEEM blockchain is the right thing to do. I mean, I get the motivation behind it, I totally understand the fear, but
something feels off to me.
Unconfiscatable?
I realize the goal here is to protect STEEM, and at no point in time will I attack anyone who's decided to go ahead and run this, but there's a core concept of crypto being trampled on right now. I mean, let's not forget the whole point is that it's your money, you do what you want with it. The point was and still is to tell the traditional financial institutions to go fork themselves.
My tokens, my vote, my say, right? Well I think today this core idea just got put on pause. Again, I understand it, I could even see myself wrestling with the decision if I was witnessing myself, but as someone with skin in the game, someone who's been here for some years now, I do believe we might be shooting ourselves in the foot. Key word: might!
It's reversible
I get it, but it's almost like holding Justin Sun hostage until he does what we all want. He did buy the tokens, they are his, this is supposed to be capitalism, free markets. I don't know, maybe I'm the idiot here, but it seems we took a turn left out of fear.
I'm not leaving by all means, but I do have to say, this is going to be a wild ride, and I for one expect it to be bloody.
MenO
Posted via Steemleo
I think the solution, the best solution lawfully available anyway, is equity.
Thanks!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
it feels weird. not really sure what to think. the problem of "ninja" mined steem should have been addressed sooner. (not sure was there a way that it could only be sold on an market). Again not sure did Justin knew about the (not written) deal of Ned(steemit) and community about the use of the stake.
And lack of any communication after the shit show of token swap and steem assimilation to tron is at least disrespectful.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
A hard decision had to be made and the decision makers made it. We can use our witness votes if we dont agree.
Hope you are good @meno
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I know they got the best intentions, hence why I've not changed my votes. Still, the outcome of this, nobody knows.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
There is always some drama, things will be ok 🤑
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It's not a job, it's an adventure....
Grab a seat, I think it's about to get crazy.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I am ready!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
it's not a job, it's an indenture.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Still very vague and confusing to me! The whole saga is!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I totally agree with you. I'm struggling here myself unsure how to feel about this. Is it protecting decentralization, or destroying it? You can make valid arguments for both cases.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit