Power down issue: is it a zero sum game? Or can we have options?

in hive-167922 •  5 years ago  (edited)

86B12057-CF85-4DC5-8C7D-BDF7462612C9.jpeg

I read with great interest the SteemitBlog post on the PowerDown Rule change. I read some very well written and impassioned arguments on both sides of this issue, as both those calling for protection and those calling for freedom wrote eloquently and well reasoned comments. I thought the collective knowledge expressed in the thread of comments was impressive. I must admit that at times I chuckled as I saw concerns for freedom, concerns for protection, concerns for freedom from protection and also calls for protection from freedom. All passionate and well reasoned but the spectrum was a bit humorous.

But as I finished reading for what seemed like an hour, I was struck by this thought. Steemit, the Steem blockchain and the spirit of cryptocurrency is about freedom and choice. And I think that the blockchain is sophisticated enough that we shouldn’t have to choose either one choice or another, it seems appropriate to give participants choices.

I think we should consider two things : first offering a choice to people how much protection they want from the Power Down feature in terms of how many weeks they want to choose to power down their account. Second I think we should discus the impact this could have on governance of the blockchain, witness votes, etc. Currently the long power down period means you need to be committed to tying up your funds for at least 13 weeks, which some feel protects the blockchain from bad actors.

One example cited was whales or exchanges from powering up, influencing governance rule changes which result in them obtaining a large cut of the reward pool and then powering down dumping those gains on the market driving down the price with the dual effect of both taking the majority of the rewards and driving down the value of the remaining rewards.

I don’t know how plausible that occurrence is, and I certainly don’t want this to scare us into inaction, but I desire the opposite.

Most importantly, I think it’s a valuable discussion to utilize all the collective brainpower here to propose changes to improve freedom, choice, attract more people to our platform and our blockchain, as well as review the effects on governance.

This article by @tarazkp is very helpful in this regard and is a good example of the creativity and diversity we have on the Steemit and I am sure there are more: Link Here: https://steemit.com/hive-174578/@tarazkp/the-return-of-locked-stake-and-passive-earning

Let us move forward as a group in the spirit of choice and options, not simply either this choice or that choice, so we can chose certain things based on our knowledge and comfort level, protect the new members of our community, liberate the older members, encourage participation by others outside our current membership, but protect our project.

We are an evolving entity, we will make desirable and undesirable changes whose effects will often only be discovered retrospectively. So a bit of caution and deliberation may be wise.

Steemit Blog Proposal Link : https://steemit.com/steem/@steemitblog/feedback-wanted-4-week-power-down

You can vote here:

Please note, there are now two proposals issued to obtain proper community sentiment IN FAVOUR or AGAINST the 4 Week Power Down change.

PROPOSAL IN FAVOUR:
https://steemit.com/steemdao/@thecryptodrive/hf-proposal-vote-to-reduce-power-down-period-to-4-weeks

PROPOSAL AGAINST:
https://steemit.com/steemdao/@thecryptodrive/hf-proposal-vote-against-reducing-power-down-period-to-4-weeks

Note that it is my understanding that this is voting for or against changing the 4 week PowerDown.
The SMT change has a separate proposal.

✍️ written by Shortsegments

5F964D1F-0DBC-429E-A9E7-BB5A09483CBA.jpeg

Read other articles by me on the Steemit Social Media Platform, where writers get paid for their content by the community by upvotes worth the cryptocurrency, called Steem.

Read my Steemleo investment Blog

AA81A35B-A542-4E0B-8E45-F0AF81EEB3A0.jpeg

Please follow my Twitter Feed Here
BB396705-60B8-4721-803C-F29DB51A87E4.jpeg

Shortsegments is a blogger or writer on the Steemit platform, where writers, photographers and video bloggers, along with other content producers get paid for posting their content. Steemit is a decentralized social media platform on a blockchain called Steem. A very important difference between Steemit and centralized platforms like Facebook, Instagram or YouTube, is that there isn’t a central authority or owner to take your account away from you and your account can’t be deleted. You are the owner of your account. Find out more at this Link

Steem Onboarding helps you apply for an account and is a series of videos which explains how Steemit works. You don’t need to understand everything about the blockchain to post content and our Onboarding help is available in six different languages.

1E5F7C8D-D2CC-4636-A727-DCC29E379455.jpeg

BF4F2613-2A40-4B4A-8A5B-9306C59296CD.gif

Posted via Steemleo

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Thanks for a well reasoned post, describing the need for options, they should be part of any free association. It can be argued that we agreed to 13 weeks when we joined Steemit, but that doesn’t mean the community can’t change the rules. That’s why we have HardForks. I think this is an issue whose time has come.
Nice job

!giphy good+read

Posted using Partiko iOS




giphy is supported by witness untersatz!

Thank you

You should consider adding the link to the Steemitblog proposal ; https://steemit.com/steem/@steemitblog/feedback-wanted-4-week-power-down

Posted using Partiko iOS

I agree we all agreed to the 13 week lockup when we joined, but the community can change its rules. I think you correctly point out these changes can have consequences do deliberation is needed. While it is difficult to reach consensus in such a diverse group, having options will help.

Posted using Partiko iOS

the same people who were earlier demanding to have shorter period of power down now opposing it

LOL...true.

the long power down period means you need to be committed to tying up your funds for at least 13 weeks, which some feel protects the blockchain from bad actors

I think we have enough bad actors also with the 13 weeks period.
x x x
In some countries, the state made laws to protect employees, making it difficult or costly to fire them. So companies don't want to hire people because they don't want to have problems if they have to fire them. Result: Unemployment surges.

In other countries, it is easy to fire employees, so companies are also more willing to hire. In worst case they can send them away later. Result: Unemployment decreases.

Interesting analogy.